Contactor Trip Control with Independent Overcurrent Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional contactor control systems fail to protect loops when the control unit is faulty, leading to unprotected operation during faults such as overloads or short circuits.

Innovation Solution

A contactor control apparatus comprising an electrical signal detection unit, a control unit, a first execution unit, a contactor, a protection unit, and a second execution unit, where the protection unit can independently open the contactor to disconnect the loop when it detects excessive current, regardless of the control unit's status, using separate trip thresholds for overload and short circuit protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a control unit is used to directly control the contactor based on real-time current detection, then automation and loop control function are improved, but the loop cannot be protected when the control unit is faulty

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveautomationVSAvoidloop protection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into two independent segments: a control unit for automated operation and a protection unit for safety protection. The protection unit independently monitors current and can directly open the contactor without relying on the control unit, ensuring that automation functions can fail without compromising basic safety protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protection unit acts as an intermediary safety mechanism between the control unit and the contactor. It provides a direct current monitoring path that bypasses the control unit's decision-making process, ensuring that fault detection and protection actions can occur independently of the control unit's operational status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If a single control unit is used to control the contactor, then device complexity is reduced, but the system fails to provide protection when the control unit is faulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidfault protection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into a control unit for normal operation and a protection unit for safety monitoring. This segmentation adds a separate protection pathway that operates independently, ensuring that a single point of failure in the control unit does not compromise overall system safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protection unit provides self-service protection by independently monitoring current conditions and directly controlling the contactor opening operation when faults are detected, without requiring intervention or functional input from the control unit. This self-service capability ensures protection even when the control unit is non-functional.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the protection unit operates independently of the control unit, then loop protection reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloop protection reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protection function is extracted from the control unit and implemented as a separate protection unit. This extraction allows the protection unit to operate independently with its own current monitoring and control logic, ensuring that protection reliability is not dependent on the control unit's operational status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The protection unit serves multiple functions: it monitors current, detects faults, and directly controls the contactor opening operation. This multi-functionality consolidates protection capabilities into a single dedicated unit, managing complexity by providing comprehensive protection functions in one component rather than distributing them across multiple systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3896811B1Contactor control device and power supply system
Publication Date: 2023.11.08 HUAWEI DIGITAL POWER TECH CO LTD
  • EP3896811B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3896811B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3896811B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

This application provides a contactor control apparatus and a power supply system, to protect a loop when a control unit is faulty. The control apparatus includes an electrical signal detection unit, a control unit, a contactor, a first execution unit, a protection unit, and a second execution unit. The electrical signal detection unit is configured to: detect an electrical signal on a loop, and send the electrical signal to the control unit. The control unit is configured to: generate a control signal based on the received electrical signal, and send the control signal to the first execution unit. The contactor is connected to the loop. The first execution unit is configured to control the contactor to be closed or opened based on the received control signal, where when the contactor is closed, the loop is connected, and when the contactor is opened, the loop is disconnected. The protection unit is configured to detect a current value on the loop when the contactor is closed, where an opening instruction is sent to the second execution unit when the current value reaches a trip threshold. The second execution unit is configured to open the contactor when receiving the opening instruction.