Container Base Area Support Projections for Cover Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional containers for liquid and pasty products, such as milk, face issues with stability and reliable fixation of covers, leading to increased manufacturing costs and risk of damage due to insufficient reinforcement and detachment of covers.

Innovation Solution

The container design features radially inwardly projecting support projections on the bottom area, forming a profiling that stabilizes the base and allows reliable fixation of the cover, with the support projections also serving as a stacking aid and facilitating easy product removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the wall thickness of the cup-like shell is reduced to lower manufacturing costs, then production costs decrease, but the stability and strength of the container bottom deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidbottom area stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom area of the shell is segmented into multiple recesses arranged in the circumferential direction, creating a profiled structure that distributes mechanical loads across multiple zones. This segmentation allows the thin-walled shell to maintain high stability by localizing stress at specific recess regions rather than distributing it uniformly, preventing catastrophic failure while using minimal material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a flat bottom surface to a three-dimensional profiled structure with multiple recesses having different depths and positions. This dimensional change creates a micro-topography on the bottom surface that provides both structural reinforcement and functional benefits for cover fixation, effectively adding strength without increasing overall wall thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If a printed cover is added to stabilize the shell and reduce wall thickness, then manufacturing costs decrease, but the reliability of cover fixation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcover fixation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of trying to make the cover stick to the smooth shell surface, the invention inverts the approach by creating recesses in the shell bottom that actively engage with the cover's lower edge. The cover is fixed not by adhesion to a flat surface but by mechanical interlocking with the profiled recess structure, reversing the traditional fixation paradigm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The recesses act as an intermediary mechanical interface between the shell and cover. Rather than direct contact between the cover edge and flat shell surface, the recesses provide a mediating structure that converts the cover's radial inward force into stable positioning, ensuring reliable fixation while maintaining the ability to easily remove the cover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If multiple circumferential indentations are added to stabilize the bottom area, then bottom stability improves, but the ease of cover fixation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebottom area stabilityVSAvoidcover fixation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the bottom surface are given different local qualities through varying recess depths, shapes, and distributions. Some recesses are deeper to provide primary structural support, while others are shallower to facilitate cover engagement. This local differentiation optimizes both stability and ease of cover fixation simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention varies multiple parameters of the recesses including depth, width, circumferential spacing, and radial positioning. By optimizing these parameters, the recesses provide sufficient mechanical support for bottom stability while maintaining adequate clearance and engagement features that enable easy cover placement and removal without excessive force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2377766B1Container
Publication Date: 2012.06.27 OPTIPACK
  • EP2377766B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP2377766B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP2377766B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

The container has a beaker-shaped shell (10) forming an inner limiting surface of the container, and a cover for covering an outer limiting surface of the shell. The cover is made from printable material, and the shell has a casing area (12) tapered from an upper opening to a base area (20). The base area has outwardly projecting supporting projections (22) arranged one behind the other in a circumferential direction of the shell. A lower edge of the cover is attached to upwardly-pointing limiting surfaces (24) of the projections, where the cover is made from plastic foil, paper or cardboard.