Container-Based Item Identification for Faster Accurate Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing item identification and tracking systems are computationally intensive and time-consuming, particularly when identifying multiple items in real-time, and face challenges in maintaining accuracy due to shifts in camera, 3D sensor, and platform positions without routine maintenance, which is labor-intensive and error-prone.

Innovation Solution

A system using cameras and 3D sensors to identify and track items on a platform, with dynamic recalibration of homographies to maintain accuracy, and techniques to intelligently detect triggering events and reduce search spaces based on container categories and user interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional item identification methods compare item features against every item in a database containing thousands of items, then identification accuracy can be maintained, but the process becomes computationally intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem identification accuracyVSAvoiditem identification speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the item identification process into two stages: first, extract distinctive features from the captured image of the item; second, compare these features against the database. This segmentation allows for optimized feature matching algorithms that reduce computational complexity while maintaining identification accuracy, thereby improving processing speed without sacrificing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing item features in an organized database structure before actual identification occurs. Features are extracted and stored in advance, allowing for rapid retrieval and comparison during the identification process, thus reducing real-time computational load while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the system processes multiple items simultaneously for real-time identification, then productivity increases, but the computational complexity and time requirements become intractable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemultiple items identification throughputVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the processing of multiple items into independent parallel streams, where each item's features are extracted and compared separately. This segmentation enables the system to handle multiple items simultaneously without exponential growth in computational complexity, as each item processing chain remains independent and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial processing by identifying and processing only the most distinctive or relevant features of each item rather than analyzing all possible attributes. This selective approach reduces the computational burden per item while maintaining sufficient accuracy for real-time multi-item identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If the system requires users to manually scan or identify items, then identification accuracy can be confirmed, but this creates a bottleneck that reduces system throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem identification accuracyVSAvoiditem identification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the system to automatically capture images, extract features, and identify items without requiring user intervention. The automated identification system performs the entire process independently, eliminating the time loss associated with manual scanning while maintaining accuracy through robust automated feature matching algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If homographies are not recalibrated when camera or platform positions shift, then system complexity and maintenance requirements are reduced, but identification accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration maintenanceVSAvoiditem identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic recalibration of homographies at scheduled intervals or after detected position changes, rather than requiring continuous adjustment. This periodic maintenance approach balances the need for accuracy with reduced operational complexity, recalibrating only when necessary based on system state or time-based triggers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12602938B2System and method for item identification using container-based classification
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 7-ELEVEN INC
  • US12602938B2 patent drawing
  • US12602938B2 patent drawing
  • US12602938B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device detects a triggering event that corresponds to a placement of an item on a platform. In response, the device captures an image of the item and generates a first encoded vector for the image. The first encoded vector describes one or more attributes of the item. The device determines that the item is associated with a first container category based on the one or more attributes of the item. The device identifies one or more items that have been identified as having placed inside a container associated with the first container category. The device displays a list of item options that comprises the one or more items on a graphical user interface (GUI). The device receives a selection of a first item from along the list of item options and identifies the first item as being inside the container.