Refrigerated Container Docking Closure for Low Heat Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing refrigerated containers and cooling stations face challenges in minimizing heat loss when undocked and in efficiently managing the docking process, leading to energy inefficiencies and user-friendliness issues.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a container with a closure element that automatically moves between open and closed positions for docking points, using a rotatable or gravity-activated mechanism, and a cooling station with a multi-phase refrigerant like binary ice for efficient cooling, allowing for precise temperature control and reduced energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the container is docked to the cooling station with open docking points, then cooling efficiency is improved, but heat loss increases when undocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat lossVSAvoiddocking operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The closure element is positioned in advance to cover the docking point before the container is fully docked or undocked. This preliminary action prevents heat loss during the transition phase when the container is partially connected, without interfering with the docking operation itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The closure element is extracted as a separate component that can independently cover the docking point. This allows the docking point to remain structurally simple and easily accessible for docking operations, while the closure element provides thermal protection when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Loss of energy

If a closure element is added to close docking points, then heat loss is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat lossVSAvoidclosure mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closure element utilizes the existing docking motion itself to trigger its opening and closing. When the container approaches the cooling station, the docking point naturally pushes the closure element open; when undocked, gravity or a simple spring mechanism closes it automatically. This self-service approach minimizes additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A simple intermediary mechanism (such as a cam, lever, or spring-loaded flap) connects the docking motion to the closure element's opening/closing action. This intermediary translates the mechanical docking movement into the desired closure action without requiring complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If manual operation of closure element is required, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure operationVSAvoidautomation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closure element automatically responds to the docking state without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by using the docking motion to trigger closure opening and using gravity or spring force to close it when undocked, eliminating the need for manual operation while keeping the mechanism simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution minimizes heat loss during undocking, enhances user-friendliness, and achieves energy-efficient cooling by using binary ice, which maintains optimal temperatures without the need for temperature regulation, allowing for efficient cooling of refrigerated goods.

Implementation Method 1

the closure element can be moved into a closed position by the action of gravity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

the cooler is designed as a heat exchanger that contains a multi-phase, free-flowing refrigerant on the cold side... the multi-phase refrigerant... can absorb heat from the circulating air flow and transform it into latent heat by melting part of the solid phase of the refrigerant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

the cooler is designed as a heat exchanger that contains a multi-phase, free-flowing refrigerant on the cold side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentEP2213967B1Cooling station
Publication Date: 2016.11.09 BLANCO PROFESSIONAL GMBH CO
  • EP2213967B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2213967B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2213967B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A container (247) with a housing (248) surrounding a receiving space (252) for receiving refrigerated goods to be cooled, wherein the container can be docked to a cooling station and at least one first docking point (262) for discharging circulating air from the container and at least one second docking point (266) for supplying cooled circulating air to the container, which has a particularly low heat loss after undocking from the cooling station, it is proposed that the container have at least one closure element (284) for closing a docking point of the container when the container is undocked from the cooling station.