Container Filling Volume Control Without Probes or Lifting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container filling systems, such as return air tube and probe fillers, require complex and expensive lifting devices, struggle with hygiene issues, and are inefficient due to increased process angles and times, leading to potential contamination and reduced output.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that utilize a container detection system to capture the external shape and weight of each container, determining the filling volume based on these measurements, eliminating the need for lifting devices, filling probes, and return air ducts, and ensuring precise level filling through volume calculation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If lifting devices are used to insert return air tubes or probes into containers, then the filling process can be controlled, but the device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling process controlVSAvoidlifting device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the lifting device, return air tube, and probe from the filling system. Instead of using these complex mechanical components to control the filling process, the invention uses a simplified valve mechanism that opens and closes based on a schedule, eliminating the need for probes to detect fill levels or lifting devices to position components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical lifting device and probe system with a valve-controlled system. The valve opens and closes according to a predetermined schedule without requiring mechanical lifting or probe insertion, substituting a complex mechanical detection and positioning system with a simpler timed valve operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If lifting devices and long stroke mechanisms are used, then containers can be pressed against the filling device, but the process angle and process time increase, reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer positioningVSAvoidfiller output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the lifting device and long stroke mechanism entirely. Containers are positioned and filled without requiring vertical lifting or extended stroke movements, thereby reducing the process angle and process time while maintaining reliable container positioning through the simplified valve system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If probes or return air ducts are immersed in containers, then filling can be controlled, but hygiene standards become difficult to meet due to contamination risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling controlVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the probe and return air duct from the system. By eliminating these components that must be immersed in the container, the invention eliminates the contamination risk associated with probe immersion while maintaining filling control through the scheduled valve operation that does not require internal container components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The filling system operates without requiring probes or return air ducts to be placed inside containers. The valve system controls filling based on external scheduling rather than internal container conditions, allowing the system to function without components that could introduce contaminants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If complex lifting devices and stroke curves are implemented, then precise filling can be achieved, but the torque on the filler carousel increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefill level precisionVSAvoidcarousel torque
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the lifting device and stroke curve mechanism. Precise fill level control is achieved through scheduled valve operation rather than mechanical positioning, thereby eliminating the additional torque that would be required to drive complex lifting and positioning mechanisms on the filler carousel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP4707226A1Method and device for filling containers
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 KRONES AG
  • EP4707226A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4707226A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4707226A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates, inter alia, to a method for filling containers (12) with a fill material. The outer shape of a container (12) is detected by means of a container detection device (24), and an outer volume (A) of the container (12) is determined based on the detected outer shape. The weight of the container (12) is detected by means of a weighing device (30). A filling volume (F) is determined based on the determined outer volume (A) and the detected weight. The container (12) is filled with the fill material according to the determined filling volume (F) by means of a filling device (34).