Container Hardware Access Segmentation for Cryptanalysis Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cloud environment containers face challenges in preventing cryptanalysis attacks, as they may gain access to encrypted data objects by repeatedly trying different encryption keys, leading to inefficient resource usage in monitoring for such attacks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that restricts hardware access to containers based on their described hardware requirements, where safe containers are restricted from accessing hardware and thus do not need monitoring for cryptanalysis attacks, while unsafe containers are monitored for potential threats after satisfying predefined conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all containers are monitored for cryptanalysis attacks, then security coverage is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments containers into two categories: safe containers (those without direct hardware access) and unsafe containers (those with direct hardware access). This segmentation allows the system to apply different monitoring strategies to different container types, monitoring only unsafe containers for cryptanalysis attacks while leaving safe containers unmonitored, thereby reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If direct hardware access is permitted to containers, then container functionality is improved, but vulnerability to cryptanalysis attacks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer functionalityVSAvoidvulnerability to cryptanalysis attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating hardware access permissions based on specific container requirements. Instead of uniformly restricting or allowing hardware access to all containers, the system permits direct hardware access only to containers that have been identified as unsafe and require monitoring, while restricting hardware access from safe containers. This localized approach maintains functionality for containers that need hardware access while minimizing vulnerability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12015689B2Container management for cryptanalysis attack protection
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 RED HAT LLC
  • US12015689B2 patent drawing
  • US12015689B2 patent drawing
  • US12015689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Containers can be managed for cryptanalysis attack protection. For example, a computing system can receive, from a container, a description specifying a first hardware requirement for the container. The computing system can restrict access to hardware based on the first hardware requirement for the container. The computing system can perform, for a data object requested by the container, an encryption operation and a decryption operation using the hardware. A result of the encryption operation can be inaccessible to the container prior to the decryption operation.