Shipping Container Housing with Smart Folding and Biodegradable Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current housing solutions for emergencies and disaster relief are costly, logistically challenging, environmentally harmful, lack sustainable materials, and do not facilitate easy deployment or disposal, and lack standardized interfaces for services like water, electricity, and electronics.

Innovation Solution

The use of smart folding technology with elastomeric joints and hardened connectors to convert shipping containers into 3D structures, combined with renewable and biodegradable materials like high amylose starch-based wallboards and sucrose-based polyurethane foam, and sandwich construction with biodegradable components for rapid deployment and easy disposal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional housing solutions are used for disaster relief, then housing can be provided, but cost increases significantly and deployment becomes logistically challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing provisionVSAvoidlogistics complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The housing system is divided into modular units that can be independently transported and assembled. Each module contains integrated living spaces and can be stacked or configured in various arrangements, simplifying logistics while maintaining reliable housing provision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Housing modules are designed to nest within each other during transport, with smaller units fitting inside larger containers. This nesting approach dramatically reduces transportation volume and logistical complexity while enabling rapid deployment when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Strength

If shipping containers are used for housing, then structural integrity is maintained, but cost increases and environmental impact worsens due to disposal issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The housing structure transitions from permanent steel containers to temporary frameworks that can be easily disassembled and degraded. The framework uses materials designed to decompose naturally after use, changing the structural parameters from durable to biodegradable to reduce environmental harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The housing combines natural materials (wood, bamboo, thatch) with modern protective coatings. This composite approach maintains structural integrity during use while enabling biodegradation after disposal, reducing the environmental impact of housing units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If rapid deployment is achieved through folding mechanisms, then deployment speed increases, but structural complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidfolding mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The housing structure incorporates dynamic folding joints and articulated connections that allow the rigid framework to transform into compact configurations. These joints enable rapid deployment through simple mechanical motions while maintaining structural integrity when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The housing uses flexible yet strong membrane materials for walls and roofing that can be tensioned across the folding framework. These thin films provide weather protection and structural stability without requiring complex rigid panels, simplifying the folding mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Object-generated harmful factors

If biodegradable materials are used for housing components, then environmental friendliness improves, but manufacturing precision and durability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental friendlinessVSAvoidmaterial consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Natural biodegradable materials are combined with protective coatings and treatments that enhance durability and consistency. The composite structure maintains manufacturing precision while preserving biodegradability, as the core natural materials provide environmental benefits and the protective layers ensure consistent performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The physical and chemical parameters of biodegradable materials are modified through treatment processes to enhance their consistency and durability. Controlled modifications in density, moisture content, and surface properties improve manufacturing precision while maintaining the fundamental biodegradable nature of the materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11168485B2Low cost emergency housing
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 VBBT CORP
  • US11168485B2 patent drawing
  • US11168485B2 patent drawing
  • US11168485B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A low cost and disaster relief housing solution includes the combination of preconstructed in-service or out-of-service shipping containers that are integrated with renewable and sustainable materials to complete the buildout of the shipping containers. The embodiment also includes folding solutions that allows for a superior logistic solution for shipping and site integration.