Container Inspection Image Selection for Rare Defect Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current container treatment plants face challenges in efficiently storing and selecting relevant sensor data for inspection due to the lack of a suitable criterion for image storage, leading to inefficiencies in process monitoring and control.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating a container treatment plant that uses a transport device to capture spatially resolved sensor data, determines a deposit variable based on similarity to reference data, and stores only the most similar data on a non-volatile memory, allowing for improved inspection precision and throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all captured sensor data are stored permanently on memory devices, then complete inspection data is available for analysis, but storage requirements and data management complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection data completenessVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and stores only the most relevant sensor data by determining a deposit variable for each captured image based on similarity to reference data. This selective extraction approach stores only essential inspection data while discarding redundant information, resolving the contradiction between data completeness and storage requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different storage strategies to different data based on their inspection relevance. By calculating similarity variables and deposit variables, the system assigns different storage priorities to different images, storing high-similarity images permanently while managing low-similarity images differently, thus optimizing storage capacity allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If manual selection and review of captured images is performed, then relevant inspection data can be identified, but the process becomes impractical due to the large volume of images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidtime for image review
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic image selection and evaluation through computer-implemented methods that calculate similarity variables and deposit variables. The inspection system self-selects relevant images based on algorithmic criteria rather than requiring manual review, maintaining inspection accuracy while eliminating the time loss associated with manual processing of millions of images

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the manual selection process into an automated parameter-based selection system. By introducing similarity variables and deposit variables as quantitative parameters, the system automatically identifies relevant images based on calculated metrics rather than manual judgment, resolving the time efficiency problem while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If existing image storage strategies based on good/bad rating are used, then basic inspection functionality is maintained, but the system cannot effectively store images with new features or rare defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoidcapability to detect rare defects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary similarity assessment against reference data before final storage decisions are made. By calculating deposit variables based on similarity to known good and bad examples in advance, the system prepares for rare defect detection by pre-identifying images that warrant permanent storage, enhancing both throughput and adaptability to rare defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses reference data from previously identified defects and features as feedback to improve future detection. By storing images with high similarity to known rare defects and using this feedback loop, the system continuously improves its ability to detect new and rare defects while maintaining inspection throughput through automated processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260056135A1Method for operating a container treatment plant, container inspection apparatus for a container treatment plant
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 KRONES AG
  • US20260056135A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056135A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a container treatment plant for treating a plurality of container parts for containers wherein a transport device transports the plurality of container parts as a container part stream along a predetermined transport path from at least one treatment device of a container treatment plant to at least one further treatment device, wherein at least one sensor device for carrying out a container inspection task captures sensor data, and preferably camera images of the container parts. A deposit variable is determined which is characteristic of a deposit instruction for depositing the captured sensor data on a non-volatile memory device. The deposit variable is determined on the basis of a similarity variable which is characteristic of a similarity between the captured sensor data and predetermined and/or predeterminable reference data.