Container Locking Hook with Automatic Actuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container locking devices are complex, expensive, and prone to failure, with toggle lever and scissor mechanisms that do not guarantee a tight fit, and manual operation is required for locking and unlocking.

Innovation Solution

A container locking device featuring a single locking hook with a multi-part design, actuating elements, and a triggering device that allows automatic locking and semi-automatic unlocking, reducing production costs and failure risks, and ensuring secure container seating without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a toggle lever and scissor mechanism is used for automatic locking, then automatic locking is achieved, but the device becomes complex and expensive to manufacture and prone to failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic lockingVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the complex toggle lever and scissor mechanism from the locking device, retaining only the essential locking hook and actuating elements. This simplification removes unnecessary components while preserving the automatic locking function through a more straightforward mechanical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking device is segmented into distinct functional components: a locking hook with actuating elements, a housing, and a triggering device. This modular segmentation allows for simpler individual components that are easier to manufacture and maintain, while working together to achieve automatic locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Extent of automation

If a toggle lever and scissor mechanism is used, then automatic locking is achieved, but the corner fittings can wobble during operation and a tight fit of the container cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic lockingVSAvoidtight fit guarantee
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The actuating elements are designed to preliminarily tension the locking hook against the corner fitting before final locking engagement. This preliminary action ensures that the container is tightly secured from the outset, preventing wobble and guaranteeing a secure fit throughout operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If a single locking hook with multi-part design is used, then production costs are reduced and failure risks are reduced, but manual operation is required for locking and unlocking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidmanual operation requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking hook is designed as a multi-part structure with separate actuating elements that can be manufactured independently and assembled. This segmentation reduces production costs and allows for easier replacement of individual components, while the overall design maintains operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The triggering device is designed to automatically actuate the locking hook when a container is placed on the loading area, eliminating the need for manual operation. The system serves itself by using the container's placement as the trigger for the locking action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If a locking hook pivotably mounted on a stationary axis is used, then a simple construction is achieved, but the device does not automatically fall into its locking position and turning the spindle is time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction simplicityVSAvoidlocking speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking hook is designed to automatically fall into its locking position through its own weight and gravitational force, eliminating the need for manual spindle turning. The simple pivotable construction is enhanced with a triggering mechanism that initiates the automatic locking action, significantly improving productivity while maintaining construction simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2689964B1Container locking
Publication Date: 2019.01.16 JOST WERKE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
  • EP2689964B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2689964B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2689964B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The device (10) has a container lock housing (100) and a locking hook (110) that has a hook portion, and a hook element. The locking hook is stationary relative to housing and swivels into standby position and locking position about pivot axis. An actuator device is provided for locking hook, and has upper and lower actuating elements and a releasing mechanism that acts on upper actuating element and/or on lower actuating element after release, and automatically brings about clamping and blocking of locking hook in locking position by lower actuating element. An independent claim is included for an arrangement of locking device.