Stackable Container Locking Mechanism for Secure One-Motion Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tool storage systems lack a secure and ergonomic method for interlocking multiple containers, which complicates stacking and retrieval processes.

Innovation Solution

A system featuring a rotatable upper locking portion and a rotatable lower locking portion that interface with each other, providing multiple points of connection for enhanced security and ergonomic decoupling through simultaneous rotation, allowing containers to be securely stacked and easily separated with a single motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple locking portions are used to secure containers, then security and stability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into two separate locking portions: an upper locking portion and a lower locking portion. Each locking portion independently engages with corresponding features on adjacent containers, providing multiple security points while maintaining manageable complexity through functional segmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lower locking portion is positioned within or adjacent to the upper locking portion structure, allowing both locking mechanisms to occupy a compact space. This nesting arrangement provides enhanced security through multiple locking points without proportionally increasing the overall device footprint or operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If a secure interlocking mechanism is implemented, then container stability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer stabilityVSAvoidstacking and retrieval ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The upper and lower locking portions are designed to engage simultaneously when containers are stacked, creating a unified interlocking system. This combined approach provides enhanced stability while maintaining ease of operation, as the dual locking portions work together to secure containers in a single stacking motion without requiring separate manual locking steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking portions are designed to automatically engage when containers are properly positioned on top of each other. The gravitational force and geometric design cause the locking features to mate without requiring additional manual intervention, providing secure stacking while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If rotatable locking portions are used for ergonomic decoupling, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoupling ergonomicsVSAvoidrotational mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking portions incorporate rotational movement capability, allowing them to transition between locked and unlocked positions through rotation. This dynamic feature improves ease of operation and ergonomic decoupling by enabling a natural twisting motion, while the rotational mechanism is designed to be simple and intuitive rather than complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides secure stacking and easy decoupling of containers, enhancing both security and usability by allowing containers to be locked and unlocked efficiently, improving ergonomic handling and reducing the risk of mechanical failure.

Implementation Method 1

a first resilient member configured to bias the upper locking portion in a locked position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20240190612A1System and method for securing containers
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 HOME DEPOT PRODUCT AUTHORITY LLC
  • US20240190612A1 patent drawing
  • US20240190612A1 patent drawing
  • US20240190612A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for securing a first container to a second container comprises an upper locking portion and a lower locking portion. A first protrusion of the upper locking portion abuts the second container and restricts movement of the second container in the locked position. A surface of a second body of the lower locking portion is configured to receive a force and to cause the lower locking portion to rotate about a second pivot to an unlocked position. The rotation of the lower locking portion to the unlocked position causes a second protrusion of the upper locking portion to abut a first body of the upper locking portion and cause the upper locking portion to rotate to an unlocked position. The rotation of the upper locking portion to the unlocked position causes the first protrusion to disengage from the second container.