Container Media Validation Using Image Processing for Reuse

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data destruction and disk processing in data centers are prone to errors due to manual handling and barcode scanning, which does not confirm operator actions, leading to potential misprocessing of media items and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

A validation system using image processing techniques to identify and confirm the presence of identifiers on objects within containers, comparing images to reference images and employing blob detection to validate the contents, ensuring only valid objects are processed for reuse or destruction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual barcode scanning is used to track media items through processing steps, then operators can identify items, but error rates increase and processing time increases due to multiple discrete steps and operator error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual barcode scanning with automated optical imaging and image processing. Instead of operators manually scanning barcodes at each step, the system captures images of media items and uses computer vision algorithms to automatically identify, track, and validate them throughout the destruction process, eliminating manual intervention errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by capturing images at multiple processing stages (intake, destruction, post-destruction) and comparing them to verify proper processing. The image processing system provides real-time feedback on item identification and processing status, allowing immediate detection and correction of errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If multiple discrete processing steps with manual operations are used, then comprehensive processing can be achieved, but processing time increases and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous processing by eliminating idle time between discrete manual steps. The automated imaging system continuously captures images of media items as they move through the destruction process, and the image processing algorithm continuously analyzes these images, maintaining uninterrupted tracking and validation throughout the workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification and validation actions automatically at each stage before proceeding to the next processing step. Image processing occurs in advance to confirm item identity and processing status, preventing delays caused by manual verification at later stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If manual tracking and processing steps are used, then items can be monitored through the process, but the process becomes error-prone and susceptible to operator error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual tracking procedures with automated image-based tracking. Instead of operators manually recording and updating item status at each step, the system uses sequential imaging and automated image processing to continuously track media items, simplifying the operator's role while improving tracking accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of media items through imaging at each processing stage. These image copies serve as permanent records that can be automatically analyzed and stored, replacing manual documentation and providing an immutable audit trail without requiring complex manual tracking systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If barcode scanning is used without confirmation of operator actions, then items can be identified, but validation is delayed until the next scan and errors can occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification speedVSAvoidvalidation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements immediate feedback by analyzing images as soon as they are captured. The image processing algorithm provides real-time validation of item identification and processing status, rather than waiting for the next discrete scan event. This continuous feedback loop ensures errors are detected and corrected immediately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation by analyzing images before the media item proceeds to the next processing stage. This advance validation confirms proper identification and processing status, preventing errors from propagating through subsequent steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces errors and processing time by automating the validation process, ensuring accurate handling of media items and maintaining security by preventing unintended movement or escape of sensitive data.

Implementation Method 1

The validation process includes identifying the objects within the container by comparing an image of the container to a reference image of the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage processing: Image Processing

Implementation Method 2

The validation system may also use image processing techniques, such as blob detection, to identify invalid objects in the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBlob detection: Image Processing

Data Source

PatentUS20250335731A1Validation Of Objects
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20250335731A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335731A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335731A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and media for validating objects within a container, such that a validation system confirms that objects within a container are valid i.e., ready to be shipped from a data center for reuse or ready to be destroyed. The validation system can be used to identify objects, e.g., media, disks, etc., and determine if valid objects are at the correct processing location to be shipped or destroyed. The methods may include identifying the objects, locating an identifier on the object, comparing the identifiers to known identifiers and determining, based on the comparison, if valid objects are at the correct processing location to be shipped or destroyed. The validation system may also use image processing techniques, such as blob detection, to identify invalid objects in the container. The system may reject the entire container if invalid objects are detected.