Container Neck Protrusion for Hinged Closure Stability
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing container designs with hinged, tethered closures often fail to effectively maintain the closure in an open position, leading to potential spillage and user inconvenience during re-closure.
Innovation Solution
The incorporation of a protrusion on the A-bead of the container neck, which engages with the tab of the closure to bias the body further away from the opening, ensuring the closure remains open and facilitating easier re-closure alignment.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If a hinged, tethered closure is used to enclose the container opening, then the closure can be opened and closed easily, but the closure cannot be reliably maintained in an open position, leading to potential spillage
Solution Approach 1:
The protrusion is positioned on the A-bead to preliminarily engage with the tab and bias the closure body away from the container neck, pre-establishing the open position before the user completes the opening action. This preliminary mechanical advantage ensures the closure stays open without requiring active user maintenance.
Solution Approach 2:
The protrusion acts as an intermediary element between the A-bead and the tab, providing a mechanical interface that transfers force from the A-bead to the tab. This intermediary structure enables reliable open position maintenance without requiring direct complex interaction between the closure body and container neck.
2Reliability
If the closure body is biased away from the container neck to maintain open position, then spillage is prevented, but alignment of threads during re-closure becomes difficult
Solution Approach 1:
The protrusion creates a localized engagement point on the A-bead that specifically interacts with the tab. This localized feature provides precise mechanical guidance for thread alignment during re-closure while maintaining the overall biasing force that keeps the closure open, separating the alignment function from the positioning function.
3Reliability
If the protrusion extends upward from the A-bead to engage the tab, then the closure is biased further away from the container neck, but the protrusion may interfere with the threading engagement
Solution Approach 1:
The protrusion extends in the axial dimension (upward from the A-bead) rather than radially outward, allowing it to engage the tab and provide biasing force without interfering with the radial threading engagement between the container neck and closure. This dimensional separation resolves the interference issue.
Data Source
AI summary
A protrusion on a container neck is provided. The protrusion is configured to interface with hinged, tethered closures to bias the body of the closure away from the container neck.


