Container Treatment Parameter Control for Stable Multi-Container Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container treatment systems face challenges with process stability due to static parameter settings, complex user intervention for handling different container characteristics, and manual recipe creation for new types, leading to inefficiencies and potential quality issues.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that link container treatment parameters to characteristic values, using a storage device to store reference parameter values, allowing automatic calculation and adjustment based on user input and actual parameter measurements, with AI-enhanced optimization for optimal settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If parameters are set statically in container treatment systems, then the system structure remains simple, but process stability deteriorates and requires regular user intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter regulation systemVSAvoidprocess stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static parameter settings into dynamic parameter regulation by linking parameters to container characteristic values. The system automatically adjusts parameters based on measured container properties (such as preform weight, dimensions, or material characteristics), enabling the regulation system to adapt in real-time without increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where container characteristic values are measured and used to automatically regulate treatment parameters. This closed-loop control ensures process stability by continuously monitoring and adjusting parameters based on actual container properties, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple parameter combinations are used to achieve the same result, then flexibility increases, but the complexity of selecting optimal parameters increases and requires extensive user experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter combination flexibilityVSAvoidparameter selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to automatically select optimal parameter combinations based on container characteristic values without requiring user expertise. The system self-regulates by measuring container properties and autonomously determining the appropriate parameter settings, thereby maintaining flexibility while eliminating the complexity of manual parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent links treatment parameters directly to container characteristic values, creating a systematic relationship where parameter changes are automatically determined by measured container properties. This approach maintains adaptability across different container types while simplifying the selection process through objective, measurement-based parameter determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If manual recipe creation is performed for each container type, then parameter precision can be optimized, but the time and cost for commissioning new container types increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimizationVSAvoidcommissioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes pre-defined relationships between container characteristic values and treatment parameters through systematic measurements and evaluations. By performing preliminary characterization of container properties and their optimal treatment conditions, the system can quickly determine appropriate parameters for new container types without requiring time-consuming manual recipe creation, thus maintaining precision while reducing commissioning time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual recipe creation with an automated measurement and calculation system. Instead of relying on human experts to manually optimize parameters for each container type, the system uses objective measurements of container characteristics and automated calculations to determine optimal parameters, thereby eliminating the time and cost associated with manual commissioning while maintaining or improving parameter precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If inexperienced users operate the system with manual parameter settings, then operational simplicity is maintained, but quality consistency deteriorates and leads to increased wear and device complaints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser operation simplicityVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to automatically determine and adjust parameters based on measured container characteristics, making the system self-regulating. This eliminates the need for user expertise in parameter selection while ensuring consistent quality, as the system autonomously optimizes settings for each container type without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated feedback control where container characteristic measurements directly drive parameter adjustments. This closed-loop system ensures quality consistency by continuously monitoring container properties and automatically regulating treatment parameters, thereby maintaining high manufacturing precision even when operated by inexperienced users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12600076B2Method for operating a container treatment system and container treatment system with optimized parameters
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 KRONES AG
  • US12600076B2 patent drawing
  • US12600076B2 patent drawing
  • US12600076B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a container treatment system, wherein a plurality of parameters of the container treatment system, which are characteristic for the treatment of containers in the container treatment system, are variable and wherein the parameters are each linked to at least one value characteristic of the containers to be treated, wherein for each parameter a plurality of reference parameter values are stored in a storage device, wherein at least one characteristic value of the containers to be treated is entered at a user interface and, on the basis of this entry and the stored reference parameter values, a combination of parameter values for the parameters is calculated.