Inbound Container Prioritization via Dynamic Urgency Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current supply chain management systems face inefficiencies in international logistics due to prolonged lead times, unreliable transit times, and manual planning methods that do not consider critical factors like product demand and network constraints, leading to lost sales and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for inbound container prioritization that dynamically scores and ranks Full Container Loads (FCLs) and Less than Container Loads (LCLs) based on factors such as Port Lead Time, Product Demand fulfillment, Route Clearance, Distribution Centre availability, and Port Demurrage costs, to optimize container pickup and minimize supply chain costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual planning methods are used for container pickup, then operational simplicity is maintained, but product demand fulfillment and supply chain reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual planning simplicityVSAvoidsupply chain reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical planning processes with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to calculate priority scores for containers based on multiple factors including product demand, lead time, and network constraints. This substitution eliminates human error and subjectivity while maintaining ease of operation through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary prioritization mechanism that acts as a mediator between manual planning simplicity and supply chain reliability. The intermediary automatically processes container data, calculates priorities, and generates pickup sequences, bridging the gap between operational simplicity and reliable demand fulfillment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If first-in-first-out basis is used for container pickup, then operational simplicity is maintained, but product demand fulfillment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepickup operation simplicityVSAvoidproduct demand fulfillment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter basis for container prioritization from simple chronological first-in-first-out to a multi-parameter scoring system that considers product demand, lead time, network constraints, and other critical factors. This parameter transformation enables optimized productivity while maintaining automated operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic prioritization where container priority scores are continuously calculated and updated based on current demand conditions, lead times, and network constraints. This dynamic approach replaces static first-in-first-out sequencing with adaptive prioritization that responds to changing conditions, improving product demand fulfillment while maintaining operational simplicity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If automated prioritization system is implemented, then supply chain reliability and demand fulfillment are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupply chain reliabilityVSAvoidprioritization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal prioritization system that handles multiple container types (FCL and LCL), multiple products, multiple carriers, and multiple distribution centers through a single integrated algorithm. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into one system rather than requiring separate solutions for each scenario, making the complexity manageable and reusable across different situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the complex prioritization problem into distinct calculable components: product demand factors, lead time factors, network constraint factors, and carrier-specific factors. Each segment is calculated separately and then integrated into a comprehensive priority score, making the overall system complexity manageable through modular calculation approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If container prioritization based on multiple factors is implemented, then product demand fulfillment is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct demand fulfillmentVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial prioritization by focusing computational resources on the most critical factors affecting product demand fulfillment, such as product demand urgency and lead time constraints. Rather than equally processing all possible factors, the system applies weighted scoring that emphasizes the most impactful parameters, reducing computational complexity while maintaining high productivity for critical containers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240311742A1Demand driven, constraint-based and cost optimized inbound container prioritization for resilient supply chain
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US20240311742A1 patent drawing
  • US20240311742A1 patent drawing
  • US20240311742A1 patent drawing

AI summary

State of art techniques supply chain management system tend to mostly focus on end to end supply chain management and lose focus on the port of dispatch to retailer segment of supply chain. A method and system for demand driven, constraint-based and cost optimized inbound container prioritization for resilient supply chain is disclosed. Current demand, multiple constraints across destination port, transport carriers, distribution centers, external factors, looks at multiple supply chain cost components like free days, demurrage, transportation, manpower is considered and a ā€˜n’ week rolling dynamically prioritized list of inbound containers, is generated, which needs to be picked up from the destination port for addressing the volatile customer demand. The dynamic prioritization uses an intelligent ranking algorithm that calculates an urgency score for each container based on crucial parameters before creating a pickup list and helps in maximizing profit while reducing logistic overheads for the retailer.