Blow-Molded Container Ribs for Strength and Weight Tradeoff

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plastic blow-molded containers face a tradeoff between weight and strength, with heavy containers being strong but costly, and lighter ones lacking sufficient strength for certain applications.

Innovation Solution

The design includes a body with specific wall configurations, ribs, a tapered flange, and a handle, optimized through injection molding and blow molding processes to enhance material orientation and crystallinity, resulting in improved top load performance, vacuum resistance, and moisture vapor transmission rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If thick walls are used to increase container strength, then top load strength is improved, but material cost and container weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetop load strengthVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing ribs at specific locations on the container body where structural support is most needed. These ribs create localized areas of increased thickness and strength without requiring the entire container wall to be thick, thus maintaining top load strength while reducing overall material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite wall structure combining areas of different thicknesses - thinner walls in non-critical areas and thicker ribbed sections in load-bearing areas. This composite approach allows the container to achieve required strength characteristics while minimizing total material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If thick walls are used to increase container strength, then vacuum resistance is improved, but container weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum resistanceVSAvoidcontainer weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rib structures provide localized reinforcement that resists vacuum collapse forces at critical points on the container body. By concentrating material only where vacuum pressure creates the greatest stress, the container achieves adequate vacuum resistance without the weight penalty of uniformly thick walls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If thin walls are used to reduce material cost, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but container strength decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcontainer strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a cost-effective design by using thin walls in non-critical areas to reduce material cost, while adding ribs only in specific locations where structural strength is required. This selective reinforcement maintains adequate container strength while minimizing overall material consumption and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If uniform wall thickness is used for simplicity, then manufacturing is easier, but structural efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidstructural efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves structural efficiency by varying wall thickness through the addition of ribs at specific locations rather than using uniform thickness throughout. The blow molding process naturally accommodates these variable thickness sections, maintaining ease of manufacture while significantly improving structural efficiency and material distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a lightweight, high-strength packaging product that maintains strength comparable to heavier containers while reducing material usage, suitable for various food and beverage applications.

Implementation Method 1

the preform is softened and transferred into a mold cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

In the mold cavity, the preforms are blow-molded or stretch blow-molded and expanded into the selected container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS20230048637A1Container and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2023.02.16 RING CONTAINER TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US20230048637A1 patent drawing
  • US20230048637A1 patent drawing
  • US20230048637A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A container includes a body having opposite top and bottom walls. Opposite front and back walls each extend from the top wall to the bottom wall. Opposite first and second side walls each extend from the top wall to the bottom wall and from the front wall to the back wall. A spout extends from the top wall. A flange extends from the top wall. A handle extends from the spout to the flange.