Container Security System with Compressive Frame

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The security industry faces challenges in devising a security system for high-end candles without a discrete neck, as well as other products with similar configurations, since existing systems rely on a necked construction for effective deployment and theft prevention.

Innovation Solution

A security system comprising a frame with a force-applying structure, including friction components that can be selectively moved to exert compressive force against the access opening, allowing the system to be secured or assembled within the container, featuring a locking assembly and adaptable to various container shapes, including those without a distinct neck.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a security system is designed to fit into a necked container configuration, then it can be effectively confined and secured within the container, but it cannot be adapted to containers without a discrete neck

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different container configurationsVSAvoidsecurity effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The security system is designed with a universal frame structure that can adapt to multiple container configurations, including both necked and non-necked containers. The frame includes adjustable components that allow it to conform to different opening geometries, making the same security system applicable across various container types while maintaining security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The security system incorporates dynamic elements such as movable pressing components and adjustable friction components that can be repositioned based on the container's specific geometry. This dynamic adjustability allows the system to maintain reliable security confinement whether the container has a discrete neck or a more uniform opening structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the security system applies compressive force to prevent withdrawal, then security is enhanced, but the system becomes more complex requiring additional force-applying structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The force-applying structure is segmented into multiple independent components, including separate pressing elements and friction components, that can be individually adjusted and positioned. This segmentation allows the complex force application task to be divided into simpler, manageable parts while maintaining overall security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The security system introduces intermediary elements such as friction components and pressing members that mediate between the frame structure and the container opening. These intermediaries apply the necessary compressive force to prevent withdrawal while distributing the mechanical stress, thereby enhancing security without requiring the frame itself to be overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If friction components are pressed against the access opening surface, then withdrawal is prevented, but the friction components may damage the container surface or contents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidcontainer surface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The friction components are designed as flexible elements that can conform to the container's access opening surface without concentrating stress on small areas. This flexibility allows the friction components to maintain secure contact for preventing withdrawal while distributing pressure evenly to avoid damaging the container surface or its contents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The security system allows for adjustment of the pressing force parameters applied by the friction components. By controlling and optimizing the magnitude and distribution of compressive force, the system achieves sufficient friction to prevent withdrawal while maintaining force levels below the threshold that would cause damage to the container or its contents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents unauthorized withdrawal of the security mechanism from the container while maintaining functionality and adaptability to different container shapes, enhancing security without compromising the container's integrity.

Implementation Method 1

The force applying structure has at least one friction component that is pressed against the access opening surface with the security system in the operative relationship with the container and the security system in the secured state.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11041327B2Security system for container
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 SE KURE CONTROLS INC
  • US11041327B2 patent drawing
  • US11041327B2 patent drawing
  • US11041327B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In combination: a) a container having a case bounding a storage space and an access opening bounded by a surface and in communication with the storage space; and b) a security system. The security system has a frame and a force applying structure on the frame. The frame and force applying structure are configured so that with the security system in operative relationship with the container, the security system can be placed selectively in: i) a secured state wherein the force applying structure exerts a compressive force against the access opening surface to thereby prevent at least a part of the security system from being withdrawn from the access opening; and ii) an assembly state wherein the at least part of the security system can be directed into and withdrawn from the access opening.