Modular Shipping-Container Self-Storage for Fast Low-Cost Construction
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing self-storage facilities are expensive to design and build, and there is a need for innovative solutions to reduce construction costs and time while providing flexible storage configurations.
Innovation Solution
Utilizing standard steel shipping containers as modular units that can be stacked and modified to create multi-level storage facilities, allowing for variable partitioning and access mechanisms, eliminating the need for additional infrastructure.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If traditional construction methods are used to build self-storage facilities, then structural strength and stability are ensured, but construction costs and time increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The facility is divided into modular container units that can be manufactured independently and assembled like LEGO blocks. Each container serves as a standardized module with defined dimensions and structural characteristics, allowing parallel manufacturing and rapid deployment of multiple units simultaneously
Solution Approach 2:
Containers are pre-manufactured in controlled factory environments with all structural reinforcements, insulation, and finishing work completed before delivery to the site. This preliminary preparation eliminates on-site construction delays and ensures consistent quality without weather-related interruptions
2Adaptability or versatility
If traditional construction methods are used, then design flexibility is achieved, but construction complexity and costs increase
Solution Approach 1:
The facility design allows dynamic reconfiguration of storage spaces by moving dividing walls within containers and repositioning entire container modules. This enables the facility to adapt to changing storage demands without major construction projects, maintaining flexibility while simplifying the overall structural system
Solution Approach 2:
Standardized container modules serve multiple functions: structural support, climate-controlled storage space, security enclosure, and modular stacking unit. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate construction elements needed while maintaining design versatility through different arrangement configurations
3Volume of stationary object
If single-level facility design is used, then construction simplicity is maintained, but space utilization efficiency decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The facility transitions from horizontal expansion to vertical stacking by placing containers on top of each other. This three-dimensional arrangement multiplies storage capacity without increasing footprint, effectively adding storage volume by utilizing the vertical dimension rather than requiring additional horizontal space
4Reliability
If custom-built storage units are constructed, then structural integrity is ensured, but manufacturing costs increase
Solution Approach 1:
Instead of designing unique structural systems for each facility, the invention replicates proven, standardized container designs that have already been engineered and tested for structural integrity. These copied designs are manufactured using established processes and assembly methods, significantly reducing R&D and manufacturing costs while maintaining reliable structural performance
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3A~3B
Figure 4A
AI summary
A self-storage facility. The facility comprises a plurality of commercial containers located at a single facility. The facility further comprises at least one dividing wall within an interior of each of the plurality of containers, thereby separating the interior into a plurality of storage volumes. The facility further comprises and least one access mechanism for each of the plurality of storage volumes.