Container Sorting and Accumulation for Multi-Source Pharmacy Orders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pharmaceutical order processing systems face inefficiencies in sorting and processing custom and specialty pharmacy orders, requiring substantial operator interaction and struggling to efficiently combine multiple types of pharmaceuticals from different sources for accurate packaging and shipment.

Innovation Solution

A material handling system with a container sorting device that scans and separates containers based on identifiers, an accumulator that groups containers by order, and a packing device that packages these grouped containers with associated literature, all controlled by a controller communicating with a database to optimize the sorting and packaging process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual sorting processes are used for pharmacy orders, then operator flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but labor intensity increases and processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment efficiencyVSAvoidoperator interaction requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated container identification, sorting, and routing without operator intervention. Containers are automatically scanned, identified by unique identifiers, and directed to appropriate destinations based on order requirements, eliminating the need for manual sorting while maintaining high adaptability to different order types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical sorting operations are replaced with an automated system using optical scanning, electronic identification, and automated material handling. The system substitutes human operators with automated devices that scan container identifiers and mechanically route containers through the fulfillment center.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated container sorting is implemented, then processing speed and productivity increase, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer sorting speedVSAvoidsorting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated sorting system is designed with universal functionality to handle multiple container types, sizes, and destinations through a single integrated platform. The system can process different pharmacy order types (custom, specialty, multi-part) using the same scanning and routing infrastructure, reducing overall system complexity despite high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses variable parameters such as container identifier codes, destination routing parameters, and order type classifications to manage complexity. By changing these parameters dynamically based on order requirements, the system achieves high productivity without requiring complex physical reconfiguration for different sorting scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple container paths are used for sorting, then sorting accuracy and order precision improve, but system complexity and difficulty of operation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer sorting accuracyVSAvoidcontainer path configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where container identifiers are scanned and verified against order requirements in real-time. The system receives feedback from the database about correct destinations and adjusts routing decisions dynamically, ensuring high sorting accuracy while managing path complexity through intelligent control rather than physical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A central control system acts as an intermediary between the multiple container paths and the sorting decision-making process. This intermediary receives container identification data, determines the correct destination based on order requirements, and directs containers to appropriate paths, thereby managing complexity centrally rather than through distributed complex routing logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If high-volume processing is implemented, then customer satisfaction and order fulfillment realization improve, but operator workload and error potential increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment volumeVSAvoidorder processing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification of container identifiers against order requirements, automatically detecting and correcting routing errors without operator intervention. This self-service capability maintains high reliability during high-volume processing by eliminating human error potential while sustaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual verification and quality control steps are replaced with automated scanning and verification systems that continuously check container identifiers against order data. This substitution maintains high accuracy during high-volume processing by using automated mechanical and optical systems rather than human operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11548037B1Pharmacy order processing system container sorting devices and related methods
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 EXPRESS SCRIPTS STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT INC
  • US11548037B1 patent drawing
  • US11548037B1 patent drawing
  • US11548037B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An order processing system, such as may be used in a high-volume pharmacy, may include a material handling system, an accumulator, and a packing device. The material handling system may move containers through a plurality of container paths. The container sorting device may receive the containers, scan the plurality of containers to detect container identifiers, and separate the containers based on the container identifiers to travel through a first container exit path or a second container exit path. The accumulator may accumulate containers that traveled through the first container exit path and the second container exit path. The accumulator may include an accumulator scanning device for scanning the containers to detect the container identifiers. The accumulator may group the containers together based on the detected container identifiers and orders, and provide the grouped containers. The packing device may package the grouped containers along with literature associated with the orders.