Container Filling by External Volume Adjustment for Level Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blow molding and filling processes for plastic containers are often separate and inefficient, leading to high costs and challenges in accurately controlling the final product level within the container.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for simultaneously forming and filling containers, where a force is applied to the exterior surface of the container to adjust the product level, allowing for precise control of the volume and final product level.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If blow molding and filling are performed as separate processes, then each process can be optimized independently, but transport costs and time commitments increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess optimizationVSAvoidtransport and time commitments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines blow molding and filling operations into a single integrated process where the container is formed and filled simultaneously in one mold cavity, eliminating the need for separate transport steps and reducing overall processing time while maintaining independent process optimization benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of time

If integrated blow molding and filling systems are used, then transport costs are eliminated, but synchronization complexity and equipment complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport costsVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the filling system directly into the blow molding press, allowing the filler to be positioned within or adjacent to the mold cavity, thereby eliminating transport needs while reducing synchronization complexity through spatial integration rather than complex temporal coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the mold cavity itself as an intermediary structure that serves both forming and filling functions, with the cavity acting as both the shaping boundary and the receiving container for the fill material, simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If separate blow molding and filling processes are used, then equipment simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision of final product level deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment simplicityVSAvoidfinal product level control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the filling process is controlled based on real-time monitoring of container formation progress and product level detection, allowing precise control of the final product level while maintaining relatively simple equipment through intelligent control algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If simultaneous forming and filling is implemented, then productivity increases, but control of final product level becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimultaneous operation efficiencyVSAvoidfinal product level control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-positioning the filler and pre-programming the filling sequence to occur at specific stages of container formation, allowing simultaneous operation while maintaining precision through advance planning and coordinated timing of filling relative to container expansion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and accurate control of the product level in containers, optimizing packaging by eliminating separate transport and time demands, and ensuring uniformity and accuracy in product fill levels.

Implementation Method 1

The preform can then be heated above the plastic glass transition temperature, longitudinally stretched with a stretch rod, and blown using high-pressure gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGlass transition:

Implementation Method 2

blown using high-pressure gas (e.g., air) into a container conforming to a mold. As the preform is inflated, it elongates and stretches

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

The plastic solidifies upon contacting the cooler surface of the mold and the finished hollow container is subsequently ejected from the mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS20250353237A1Method of fluid forming and filling containers
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 DISCMA AG
  • US20250353237A1 patent drawing
  • US20250353237A1 patent drawing
  • US20250353237A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Ways for controlling a level of a product in a container are provided that include engaging an exterior surface of the container containing the product at a first product level. A pulling force is applied to the exterior surface of the container to cause the container to change from a first volume to a second volume. Cessation of the force results in the container containing the product at a second product level. The second product level can provide an accurate and reproducible final product level in the container.