Work Container Wall Structure for Uniform Vibratory Grinding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vibratory grinding processes result in uneven machining of small components due to laminar flow and adhesion, leading to reduced processing time and formation of flow dead zones, particularly in round containers.

Innovation Solution

A wall component with a microstructure and superposed macrostructure that imposes a radial component on components within the container, preventing laminar flow and adhesion, using macro elevations as flow deflectors and microstructures to ensure uniform machining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a smooth inner wall is used in the container, then components can move freely without adhesion, but laminar flow patterns form causing uneven machining due to components following the wall in parallel flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent movement freedomVSAvoidmachining uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The inner wall is provided with microstructures (micro elevations and depressions) that create localized turbulence zones. These microstructures are distributed across the wall surface to generate chaotic flow patterns in specific regions, preventing laminar flow while maintaining overall component circulation. This local modification of flow characteristics solves the contradiction between free movement and machining uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If deflectors are added at the inner wall to impose radial movement, then laminar flow is broken and components are deflected toward the center, but flow dead zones with vortices form behind the deflectors causing components to stop and adhesion to occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining uniformityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The deflector geometry is optimized by changing its parameters (shape, size, positioning) to minimize vortex formation. The deflector is designed with specific dimensional ratios and angular orientations that reduce flow separation and minimize the creation of flow dead zones, thereby maintaining component circulation while achieving uniform machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The deflector surfaces are designed with curved rather than sharp edges to reduce flow separation. The curved geometry promotes smoother flow transitions and reduces the formation of vortices behind the deflector, minimizing flow dead zones while maintaining the radial movement component necessary for breaking laminar flow patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Manufacturing precision

If macro elevations are used as flow deflectors, then radial component is imposed on components, but flow shadows and dead zones form in front of and behind the deflector where adhesion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining uniformityVSAvoidadhesion in flow dead zones
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The macro elevations are combined with microstructures that create a porous-like surface topology. This multi-scale structure disrupts flow shadows and prevents the formation of large stagnant zones where adhesion could occur. The microelevations and microdepressions on and around the macro elevations create localized turbulence that keeps the flow active even in regions that would otherwise be shadow zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures uniform machining of components by reducing flow dead zones and adhesion, enhancing processing efficiency in vibratory grinding processes.

Implementation Method 1

An inner wall provided with microstructures can prevent the adhesion, in particular if the structures in the form of groove-like elevations and depressions are smaller than characteristic dimensions of the components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion prevention through microstructure: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 2

a macrostructure in the form of macroelevations is superposed on the microstructure present at the inner wall. Here, the macrostructure serves as a flow deflector to impose a radial component on the components within the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow deflection: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

vibratory grinding processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS20260042183A1Wall component
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 ROSLER HLDG GMBH
  • US20260042183A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A work container for a vibratory grinding system has a wall component that is provided with macro elevations and with micro elevations.