Containerization Framework for Application Isolation and Data Loss Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Containerization technologies face challenges in addressing unaddressed issues such as data loss during host shutdown, insufficient test coverage, and untriggered functionality limitations, leading to development delays and regression testing issues in production environments.

Innovation Solution

A framework is introduced that includes a test manager and test controller to determine an optimal execution environment for applications, allowing for gradual introduction of isolation levels and data collection on corner cases, using monitoring components to intercept system calls and gather data on resource interactions, and generating attributes to update containerization settings for optimal execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If containerization is implemented to provide isolated execution environments, then resource efficiency and deployment flexibility are improved, but unaddressed issues such as data loss during host shutdown and functionality limitations occur

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedeployment flexibilityVSAvoiddata loss prevention

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing monitoring components that proactively track system calls and resource interactions before actual failures occur. The framework performs static and dynamic analysis during development and testing phases to identify potential data loss scenarios before deployment, allowing developers to address these issues in advance rather than dealing with failures in production environments.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional testing methods are used for containerized applications, then development process is simple, but test coverage is insufficient and corner cases are not detected

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvetesting simplicityVSAvoidtest coverage

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the testing process into multiple distinct phases: static analysis of container configurations, dynamic runtime monitoring of system calls, and targeted testing of corner cases. This segmentation allows each aspect to be tested with appropriate methods and tools, significantly improving overall test coverage while maintaining manageable complexity through a structured approach.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The framework introduces monitoring components as intermediaries between the containerized application and the host system. These components intercept and analyze system calls, resource allocations, and environmental interactions, providing detailed insights into application behavior without requiring changes to the application code itself. This intermediary layer enables comprehensive testing while keeping the development process relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If applications are deployed without comprehensive testing, then deployment time is reduced, but regression testing issues and development delays occur in production

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedeployment speedVSAvoiddevelopment delays

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The framework performs comprehensive static and dynamic analysis during the development and pre-deployment phases, identifying and resolving issues before applications reach production. By conducting thorough testing in advance, the framework prevents regression testing issues from occurring in production environments, thereby avoiding costly development delays while maintaining efficient deployment cycles.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If monitoring components are added to intercept system calls and gather data, then test coverage and issue detection are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveissue detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring components are designed as multi-functional elements that simultaneously perform multiple tasks: intercepting system calls, tracking resource allocations, analyzing application behavior, and generating test reports. This universal approach consolidates what could be multiple separate complex systems into a unified framework, improving issue detection capability while managing overall system complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10565092B2Enabling attributes for containerization of applications

Publication Date: 2020.02.18 RED HAT INC

AI summary

Implementations of the disclosure include a framework to provide an optimal execution environment for applications in software containers. In one implementation an apparatus is provided that includes a memory to store a plurality of application containers and a processing device coupled to the memory. The processing device is to identify an application to execute in a container associated with a first environment. A monitoring component is injected into the first environment to collect event data associated with an interaction of the application with one or more system resources. Using the collected event data, an indication of a restraint on an execution of the application is identified. Thereupon, one or more attributes are generated to update the application container to execute the application in a second environment in view of the restraint.