Containerized AI Model Customization for Dynamic Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI model deployment systems lack flexibility and efficiency due to rigid workflows, manual intervention, static container configurations, and inadequate resource management, leading to inefficiencies in cloud, edge, and hybrid computing environments.

Innovation Solution

Systems and methods for dynamically generating customized AI model instances, deploying software components, and configuring runtime environments within containerized execution environments, allowing for adaptable computing resource allocation and reduced manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If rigid deployment workflows with manual intervention are used, then system control and configuration accuracy are improved, but deployment time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service deployment through automated workflows where the deployment engine automatically configures execution environments, allocates computing resources, and manages dependencies without requiring manual intervention. The system self-configures container instances, runtime environments, and software components based on predefined templates and specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring execution environment templates, pre-defining resource allocation policies, and pre-establishing dependency management rules. These preliminary configurations are stored and automatically applied during deployment, eliminating the need for manual setup and reducing deployment time while maintaining configuration accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If static container configurations are used, then system stability and predictability are improved, but adaptability and resource utilization efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoiddeployment flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic container configurations where container instances, runtime environments, and resource allocations can be automatically adjusted based on workload requirements. The deployment engine dynamically provisions computing resources, scales container instances, and reconfigures runtime environments without requiring system restarts or manual interventions, thereby maintaining stability while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables parameter changes in container configurations by allowing dynamic modification of resource allocation parameters, container instance parameters, and runtime environment parameters. These parameter changes are managed through the deployment engine which automatically updates configurations based on current system state and deployment requirements, maintaining stability while improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If manual resource allocation is used, then resource management precision is improved, but productivity and scalability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource management precisionVSAvoiddeployment productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the deployment engine continuously monitors resource allocation, container instance performance, and runtime environment status. Based on this feedback, the system automatically adjusts resource allocation, scales container instances, and optimizes runtime configurations, maintaining precision while significantly improving productivity and scalability through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical resource allocation processes with automated computational systems. The deployment engine uses algorithms and automation to provision computing resources, manage container instances, and configure runtime environments, eliminating manual intervention while maintaining or improving resource management precision through systematic automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If predefined infrastructure settings are used, then deployment simplicity is improved, but customization capability and model execution efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment simplicityVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the deployment configuration into modular components including container instance templates, runtime environment configurations, software component definitions, and resource allocation policies. Each segment can be independently customized and combined, allowing users to start with predefined templates for simplicity while having the flexibility to customize specific segments for specialized AI model requirements, thereby maintaining both simplicity and customization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250355656A1Model customization and deployment in containerized environments
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20250355656A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355656A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355656A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various examples, systems, and methods are disclosed relating to a model customization pipeline. A first computing system can receive at least one customization of at least one artificial intelligence (AI) model corresponding to a base instance. The first computing system can generate a customized instance of the at least one AI model by updating the base instance of the at least one AI model based on the at least one customization. The first computing system can generate a software component configured to perform at least one operation using the customized instance of the at least one AI model. The first computing system can package the software component and the customized instance of the at least one AI model into a first container instance. The first computing system can deploy the software component within a runtime environment.