Content Alignment Service Identifying Extra Substantive Material

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content formats, such as audio books and electronic books, often have differences due to format variations or extra substantive material not present in corresponding companion content, making it difficult for users to identify and access additional content without manual publisher identification.

Innovation Solution

A content alignment service compares companion content items, like audio and textual content, to identify 'uncertain regions' potentially containing extra substantive material, using transcription alignment and human verification to categorize and present this information to users, enabling automated and informed content acquisition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If automated content comparison is implemented to identify extra substantive material, then user awareness and informed content acquisition improve, but system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser awareness of extra substantive materialVSAvoidcontent alignment service complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The content comparison process is divided into discrete steps: obtaining companion content items, comparing them to identify uncertain regions, receiving human input to verify extra substantive material, and generating results. This segmentation makes the complex task manageable and modular.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A content alignment service acts as an intermediary between the user and the companion content items. This service handles the complex comparison and analysis work, presenting information to users without requiring them to manually analyze differences between content formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If manual publisher identification of extra content is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but user awareness and ability to make informed decisions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification system complexityVSAvoiduser awareness of extra substantive material
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables publishers to automatically identify and tag extra substantive material in their content without requiring manual review of each item. The automated comparison process allows publishers to self-serve the identification function, reducing reliance on manual processes while maintaining information quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive content comparison is performed across all companion content items, then identification accuracy improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextra substantive material identification accuracyVSAvoidcontent comparison processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs comparison across all companion content items to ensure comprehensive identification of extra substantive material. By applying the comparison process universally rather than selectively, the system maintains high identification accuracy while the modular architecture helps manage the computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and stores companion content items in a standardized format, preparing them for comparison in advance. This preliminary organization of content enables faster subsequent comparisons and reduces processing time during actual identification operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9489360B2Identifying extra material in companion content
Publication Date: 2016.11.08 AUDIBLE INC
  • US9489360B2 patent drawing
  • US9489360B2 patent drawing
  • US9489360B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed which facilitate identifying extra substantive material within a content item not included within corresponding companion content items. For example, extra substantive material may include commentary, interviews, or improvisation included within an audio book and not included within a corresponding electronic book. Specifically, an electronic marketplace is disclosed that may analyze two companion content items to determine similarities and differences between the content items. Thereafter, portions that differ between the content items may be further analyzed to determine whether these portions include extra substantive material. Also disclosed is an electronic marketplace for providing information regarding content items, including the existence of extra substantive material within a content item. In some instances, the electronic marketplace may be configured to provide samples of extra content within a content item to a user.