Content Augmentation Similarity Matching for New User Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional systems for recommending content augmentations rely on rule-based algorithms or basic collaborative filtering techniques, which struggle to capture user preferences and scale with growing user and content data, leading to performance and efficiency challenges, especially for new users with limited interaction data.

Innovation Solution

Leveraging advanced machine learning models, such as deep learning and neural networks, to extract features from content augmentations and apply distance-based algorithms like Euclidean distances and nearest neighbor algorithms to identify similar content, even across different formats, and use transfer learning for personalized recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If rule-based algorithms or basic collaborative filtering are used for recommending content augmentations, then the system is simple to implement, but the recommendation accuracy and ability to capture user preferences deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the recommendation approach by changing the parameters from simple rule-based matching to multi-dimensional feature vectors that capture complex user preferences and content characteristics. This includes extracting features from content augmentations and representing them in a high-dimensional space where similarity can be measured more accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical rule-based algorithms with machine learning models that automatically learn patterns from data. Specifically, it uses trained models to generate feature vectors and compute similarities, substituting manual rule formulation with data-driven automated pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If traditional recommendation systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the system cannot scale with growing user and content data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the recommendation system into independent modular components: feature extraction modules for different content types, training modules for learning models, and recommendation modules for generating suggestions. This modular architecture allows each component to be developed, optimized, and scaled independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional flat recommendation structures to multi-dimensional feature spaces where content and users are represented by vectors with numerous dimensions. This dimensional expansion enables the system to handle growing data by adding new features and dimensions rather than restructuring the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If advanced machine learning models are used to extract features and apply distance-based algorithms, then recommendation accuracy and personalization improve, but computational complexity and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs feature extraction and model training in advance before actual recommendations are needed. Content features are pre-computed and stored, and machine learning models are trained beforehand, so that during runtime only lightweight similarity computations are required, significantly reducing real-time processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and separates the computationally intensive feature extraction and model training operations from the real-time recommendation process. By isolating these heavy computations into offline preprocessing steps, the system maintains high recommendation accuracy while keeping online operational complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Quantity of substance

If basic collaborative filtering is used, then the system requires minimal data, but it provides inaccurate recommendations for new users with limited interaction history

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata requirementVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy for new users
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal recommendation framework that handles both new users with limited data and existing users with extensive history through the same mechanism. The system uses content-based features and transferable user representations that work effectively regardless of the amount of interaction history available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces content feature vectors as an intermediary that bridges the gap for new users. Instead of relying solely on user interaction history, the system uses detailed content features as a mediator to generate accurate recommendations even when user data is scarce, effectively decoupling recommendation quality from data quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12608848B2Similar content augmentations system
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 SNAP INC
  • US12608848B2 patent drawing
  • US12608848B2 patent drawing
  • US12608848B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a system for identifying content augmentations based on an interaction function initiated by a user by determining an initiation of an interaction function from a first user of an interaction system, processing data associated with the interaction function using a first machine learning model to generate a feature vector, and identifying at least one recommended content augmentation based on a comparison of the feature vector for the interaction function to a feature vector for the at least one recommended content augmentation. The system then displays the at least one recommended content augmentation to the first user with a corresponding selectable user interface element for individual recommended content augmentations.