Content-Aware Image Compression Using Specialized Block Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deep image/video compression methods struggle with optimizing compression efficiency for image blocks with varying attributes, leading to sub-optimal performance when processing image blocks with different variances, objects, or textures, and are resource-intensive due to large model sizes needed for diverse image types.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a content-aware dataset generation and model selection process that groups image blocks with similar attributes into datasets, trains specific neural networks for these groups, and reduces model capacity through techniques like sparsification and pruning, while using autoregressive and hierarchical priors models for efficient compression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If deep image compression methods are trained on randomly cropped patches, then training simplicity is maintained, but compression performance on specific image blocks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining simplicityVSAvoidcompression performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image database into multiple groups based on content attributes (e.g., natural images, text, graphics). Each segment is trained separately with a dedicated model, allowing each model to specialize in specific image types rather than using a single generic model trained on random patches. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by maintaining training organization while significantly improving compression performance for each image category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single large model is used to handle diverse image attributes, then versatility is improved, but model size and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling diverse image attributesVSAvoidmodel size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of one large universal model, the patent divides the system into multiple smaller specialized models, each handling a specific image attribute group. This segmentation reduces the size of each individual model while collectively maintaining versatility across diverse image types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality through a collection of specialized models rather than a single multi-functional model. Each model is optimized for specific image attributes, and the system as a whole can handle diverse image types by selecting the appropriate specialized model, reducing overall computational burden and model size requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If multiple specialized models are trained for different image attributes, then compression efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-grouping images into attribute-based categories and pre-training specialized models for each group before actual compression tasks. This preparation work is done once during system setup, and then the pre-trained models can be efficiently selected and applied during compression operations, improving efficiency without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary component (the attribute-based grouping system and model selection mechanism) that manages the complexity of multiple specialized models. This intermediary layer handles the coordination between diverse image inputs and appropriate models, making the system easier to manage despite having multiple specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Use of energy by moving object

If model capacity is reduced through sparsification and quantization, then computational resources are reduced, but model performance may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resourcesVSAvoidmodel performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by reducing model capacity specifically for handling certain image attribute types where full precision may not be necessary. Different levels of model compression can be applied to different image groups based on their specific requirements, optimizing the balance between computational resources and performance for each category rather than uniformly compressing all models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12627794B2Content aware dataset generation and model selection for learned image compression
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 ALIBABA (CHINA) CO LTD
  • US12627794B2 patent drawing
  • US12627794B2 patent drawing
  • US12627794B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may receive an input image block, and input the input image block into multiple models which may be trained using a plurality of different datasets of image blocks. Each model of the multiple models may be trained using a dataset having similar attributes. The system may determine a model having a highest compression efficiency from among the multiple models, and encode the input image block using the determined model.