Automated Content Correlation for Credibility Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Evaluating an individual's credibility and position on a topic over time is challenging due to the vast volume of statements made by public figures across various content sources, requiring efficient collection, processing, and comparison of metadata from multiple sources.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that receives and extracts metadata from content objects, stores records of statements made by individuals regarding specific topics, identifies correlated content by comparing metadata, and generates a correlated content object for easy comparison, including a credibility or consistency score.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual collection and comparison of statements from multiple content sources is performed, then evaluation of individual credibility and position over time is possible, but the process becomes inefficient and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of collecting, storing, and comparing statements with an automated computer-implemented system. The computing device automatically receives content objects from multiple sources, extracts metadata, stores records in a repository, and compares statements across different time periods, eliminating the need for manual evaluation while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates structured copies of statements from various content sources by extracting metadata and storing them as standardized records in a repository. This allows efficient duplication and comparison of statements without handling the original diverse formats, enabling rapid analysis of an individual's positions over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If comprehensive metadata is extracted and stored from all content sources, then complete comparison of statements is achieved, but computer resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidcomputer resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential metadata from content objects that is necessary for comparison purposes, such as statement content, timestamp, and source information. This selective extraction maintains information completeness for credibility evaluation while avoiding storage and processing of redundant or irrelevant data, thus reducing computer resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the comprehensive metadata into structured records with specific fields (statement content, date, source, etc.) stored in a repository. This segmentation allows the system to efficiently query and compare only relevant portions of the data when evaluating statements, reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining complete information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple content sources are monitored for statements, then comprehensive coverage of individual positions is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent source coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing device is designed with universal functionality to receive and process content objects from multiple different content sources (newspapers, magazines, electronic repositories, etc.) through a standardized interface. This multi-functionality allows comprehensive coverage of various sources without requiring separate specialized systems for each source, thereby managing complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies homogeneous processing methods and standardized metadata extraction across all diverse content sources. By treating different sources uniformly through the same computational framework and storage structure, the system achieves comprehensive coverage without proportionally increasing complexity, as the same processes handle all sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Data Source

PatentUS10268690B2Identifying correlated content associated with an individual
Publication Date: 2019.04.23 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10268690B2 patent drawing
  • US10268690B2 patent drawing
  • US10268690B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method includes: receiving, by a computing device, a plurality of content objects from one or more computer content source devices; extracting, by the computing device, metadata from the plurality of content objects; storing, by the computing device, a plurality of records having the extracted metadata in a repository, wherein each record identifies a time in which a statement was made by an individual regarding a topic; identifying, by the computing device, correlated content between the plurality of content objects based on comparing the metadata in the records, wherein the correlated content includes a plurality of statements made by the individual regarding the topic at different periods of time; generating, by the computing device, a correlated content object having the correlated content; and providing, by the computing device, the correlated content object to a user device.