Digital Content Credibility Scoring via Multi-Level Usage Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In closed and secure environments, it is challenging for internal search engines to surface the relevance or quality of documents due to a smaller user base and continuously streaming content, making it difficult to prioritize documents that are more important to search queries.

Innovation Solution

A method that assigns a usage score to each digital content item based on different levels of user interaction, such as surfacing, reading, saving, and citing, and aggregates these scores to rank items, allowing for the gauging of credibility and relevance within a user base.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional search engines are used in closed secure environments, then document retrieval is possible, but the ability to surface relevant and important documents is reduced due to smaller user base and continuously streaming content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument relevance assessmentVSAvoiduser base size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of document evaluation from simple citation counts to a multi-level usage score system that weights different interaction types (views, reads, saves, citations) differently. This allows reliable relevance assessment even with smaller user bases by considering the quality and depth of engagement rather than just quantity of interactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary usage scoring mechanism that mediates between user interactions and document ranking. This intermediary layer aggregates and weights various user actions to produce a comprehensive relevance signal, enabling reliable document surfacing despite limited direct user feedback in closed environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If citation tracking is used to assess document quality, then document importance can be measured, but it fails to capture the full spectrum of user engagement levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument quality assessmentVSAvoidusage level coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments document usage into multiple distinct levels (surface views, reads, saves, citations) rather than treating all interactions equally. Each level is assigned a weight reflecting its significance, creating a nuanced quality assessment that captures the full spectrum of user engagement from passive viewing to active citation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds dimensional depth to document evaluation by creating a multi-dimensional usage score system. Instead of a single citation count dimension, it incorporates multiple interaction dimensions with different weights, providing a more comprehensive and precise measurement of document quality and relevance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11275800B2Gauging credibility of digital content items
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11275800B2 patent drawing
  • US11275800B2 patent drawing
  • US11275800B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are techniques for gauging credibility of digital content items. For each digital content item in a list of digital content items, a usage score is identified for each different level of usage and for a user base and the usage score for each different level of usage is added to obtain a total usage score for the digital content item. Each digital content item in the list is ranked using the total score of each digital content item.