Content Edit Review Mechanism for Quality Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current content delivery systems lack a mechanism to review edits before they are published, leading to potential inappropriate or low-quality content being served to users, which can negatively impact both user experience and content providers.
Innovation Solution
A method and system that allow for the review of edits to content items before they are published, involving storage of edits in a separate storage, insertion of events into an event processing system for approval, and subsequent delivery of approved edits to user devices, enabling content providers to verify and ensure quality content.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Speed
If edits are published immediately without review, then content delivery speed is improved, but content quality and appropriateness deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a review mechanism that performs preliminary actions (review and approval) on edits before they are published. The system receives an edit, stores it in first storage, processes it through an event processing system that determines whether the edit is approved, and only then publishes it to the second storage for delivery. This preliminary review action ensures content quality is maintained while enabling fast delivery of approved content.
2Reliability
If a review mechanism is implemented for edits, then content quality is improved, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the content delivery system into distinct functional components: first storage for pending edits, an event processing system for review and approval determination, and second storage for approved content. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, managing system complexity through modular organization while maintaining content quality through the review process.
3Object-affected harmful factors
If edits are reviewed before publication, then inappropriate content is reduced, but processing time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an event processing system as an intermediary between the received edit and the final publication. This intermediary component processes the edit through approval determination logic, filtering out inappropriate content while allowing suitable edits to pass through. The intermediary approach systematically reduces harmful content without requiring complete manual review of every edit, balancing quality control with processing efficiency.
Data Source
AI summary
A method and system for reviewing edits and editing content items are provided. An edit to a first version of a first content item is received. The first version of the first content is part of the active content delivery campaign and has been delivered over a computer network to a first plurality of computing devices. The edit is stored in a first storage that is separate from a second storage. An event indicating the edit is inserted into an event processing system. A result approving the edit is received from the event processing system. In response to receiving the result approving the edit, a second version is caused to be stored in the second storage. The second version reflecting the edit is caused to be delivered over the computer network.