Content Editing System With Expertise Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing electronically accessible documentation for all features of large-scale applications is challenging due to the vast number of features, rapid updates, and the lack of knowledge among content editors, leading to inaccurate or outdated content.

Innovation Solution

A network-based system that verifies user expertise before allowing content editing and monitors content for recency, automatically reverting to previous versions if it becomes outdated or less useful.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If collaborative content editing systems are used to generate content, then content creation capability is improved, but content accuracy and maintenance quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent creation capabilityVSAvoidcontent accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting when content needs updating based on feature changes in the application, and proactively notifying relevant users before content becomes outdated. This prevents inaccurate content from being created in the first place by ensuring updates are initiated timely based on actual feature changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where users can rate the usefulness of content, and the system monitors this feedback to identify outdated content. When content receives low ratings or no updates for extended periods, the system automatically triggers review processes or reverts to previous versions, creating a closed-loop feedback system that maintains content accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If content is created for all features, then documentation completeness is improved, but content freshness and accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocumentation completenessVSAvoidcontent freshness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes continuous monitoring of content freshness by tracking when content was last updated and comparing it against feature change timestamps. This continuous comparison allows the system to automatically identify outdated content and trigger updates or reversals, ensuring that documentation remains fresh and accurate for all features without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting outdated content based on feature changes and user feedback, then autonomously initiating reversal processes or notifications without requiring administrator intervention. This self-service mechanism maintains content freshness across all features while preserving documentation completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If user expertise is not verified before editing, then ease of content editing is improved, but content quality and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of content editingVSAvoidcontent quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer in the form of an expertise verification mechanism that sits between users and the content editing process. This intermediary assesses user expertise levels and assigns appropriate access rights, allowing easy editing for qualified users while preventing unqualified users from making changes that would degrade content quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of user access rights based on verified expertise levels. Users with higher expertise ratings are granted broader editing permissions, while users with lower expertise levels have restricted access. This parameter change maintains ease of operation for qualified users while protecting content quality from unqualified edits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3811239B1Metric-based content editing system
Publication Date: 2022.11.09 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP3811239B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3811239B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3811239B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method may include maintaining in a database, a plurality of documentation content items for an application; receive, from a user, a request to modify a content item of the plurality of documentation content items, the content item associated with a feature of the application; accessing a rating of the user with respect to the feature; and based on the rating meeting a threshold: authorizing the user to modify the content item; receiving modifications to the content item from the user; and updating the content item in the database based on the modifications.