Content Eligibility Status for Auction Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content presentation systems on the internet struggle to effectively filter and prioritize content items based on past performance, leading to low-quality content being displayed to users due to inadequate eligibility criteria in auction systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an eligibility status system that evaluates content items based on past performance, where content items with a poor track record are declared ineligible for a period, thereby incentivizing higher bids from sponsors and improving revenue through a computer-implemented method that updates eligibility status after each auction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If content items are selected based on auction bids without eligibility filtering, then revenue from content presentation increases, but content quality deteriorates due to low-ball bids winning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent qualityVSAvoidrevenue
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of content items before they enter the auction process. Eligibility status is determined in advance based on past performance metrics, ensuring that only qualified content items participate in auctions. This preliminary filtering prevents low-quality content from winning despite low bids, thereby maintaining content quality while still generating revenue through legitimate auctions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where past auction results and content performance are continuously monitored. Eligibility status is dynamically updated based on feedback from previous presentations and user interactions. This feedback loop ensures that content items with poor performance records are excluded from future auctions, while high-performing content receives continued opportunities, thus maintaining quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If eligibility criteria are implemented to filter content items, then content quality improves, but system complexity increases due to additional evaluation mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system manages complexity by changing parameters rather than adding structural elements. Eligibility is determined by adjusting thresholds and metrics (e.g., minimum bid amounts, past performance thresholds, recency weights) rather than implementing complex multi-layered approval processes. This parameter-based approach allows flexible quality control while keeping the system architecture relatively simple and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If content items with poor past performance are excluded from auctions, then user experience improves, but the number of available content items decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidcontent availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The eligibility system is dynamic rather than static. Content items that were previously ineligible can become eligible again after demonstrating improved performance or after passing a certain period. The system continuously monitors content performance and adjusts eligibility status accordingly, ensuring that underperforming content is temporarily excluded while maintaining a steady supply of quality content items for user presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9460466B2Limiting bid selection to eligible content items
Publication Date: 2016.10.04 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9460466B2 patent drawing
  • US9460466B2 patent drawing
  • US9460466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus include computer programs encoded on a computer-readable storage medium, including a method for providing content. A request is received for content to be displayed on a resource to a user. The user is identified. Candidate content items are identified from an inventory of content items that are responsive to the request. The candidate content items are evaluated including determining bid-eligible content items including content items that satisfy an eligibility threshold based on an eligibility status associated with a respective candidate content item. The eligibility status is based at least in part on results associated with past opportunities to present a content item to identified user. An auction is conducted to identify a winner from among the bid-eligible content items. The winning content item is provided responsive to the request. An eligibility status is updated for losing and winning content items in the auction.