Content-by-Example Log for Privileged Document Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current document analysis systems face challenges in efficiently analyzing and identifying relevant electronic documents within large corpora, particularly in scenarios where certain documents are withheld due to privileges or other exemptions, making it difficult for requesting parties to assess or dispute claims of privilege.

Innovation Solution

The development of a document analysis system that generates a content-by-example log, which associates withheld documents with similar documents from a disclosed set, allowing for the analysis and identification of withheld documents of interest without direct access to them.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review of withheld documents is performed to assess claims of privilege, then accuracy of challenge identification is improved, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of challenge identificationVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a content-by-example log that copies and analyzes metadata and content characteristics of withheld documents without requiring direct human review of the full document content. This allows automated assessment of privilege claims while maintaining accuracy comparable to manual review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual document review with an automated computer-based system that uses machine learning and natural language processing to analyze document metadata, content samples, and privilege claims, significantly reducing time consumption while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If all withheld documents are reviewed to assess privilege claims, then completeness of analysis is improved, but resource requirements and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of analysisVSAvoidresource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and analyzes only the necessary portions of withheld documents - specifically metadata and content samples - rather than requiring complete document review. This extraction approach maintains completeness of analysis while significantly reducing resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by analyzing a representative subset of document content (metadata and selected samples) rather than the entire document corpus, achieving sufficient completeness for privilege assessment while optimizing resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If detailed information about withheld documents is provided in privilege logs, then ability to dispute claims is improved, but information security and privilege protection may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to dispute claimsVSAvoidinformation security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing different levels of information detail in the content-by-example log based on the specific document and privilege claim type. Sensitive portions are redacted or summarized while non-sensitive metadata and characteristics are fully disclosed, enabling dispute capability without compromising information security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that transforms raw document content into anonymized or redacted representations for the privilege log. This intermediary step allows useful information to be disclosed for dispute purposes while filtering out sensitive content that would compromise privilege protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250036864A1Systems and Methods for Document Analysis to Produce, Consume and Analyze Content-By-Example Logs for Documents
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
  • US20250036864A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036864A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036864A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Document analysis systems and methods for the generation of a content-by-example log that expresses withheld documents in terms of a set of disclosed documents are disclosed. Additionally, document analysis systems and methods for the analysis of such a content-by-example log to determine withheld documents of interest without access to those withheld documents are disclosed.