Content-by-Example Logs for Automated Privilege Log Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing document analysis systems face challenges in efficiently generating and analyzing privilege logs for withheld documents, leading to burdensome, time-consuming, and resource-intensive manual processes, especially in complex litigations with large volumes of electronic documents.

Innovation Solution

A content-by-example log is generated by analyzing withheld documents against a set of disclosed documents using a similarity function, associating identifiers for similar documents, and providing additional metadata, allowing for efficient analysis and challenge determination of withheld documents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual privilege log generation is used, then document analysis can be performed, but the process becomes burdensome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument analysis speedVSAvoidtime for privilege log generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by generating content-by-example logs that associate withheld documents with similar disclosed documents before the actual privilege log generation. This preliminary association of similar documents (e.g., using similarity functions to match withheld privileged documents with non-privileged disclosed documents) prepares the data structure in advance, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual review during the actual privilege log creation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of document characteristics and metadata from disclosed documents and applies them to withheld documents through content-by-example logs. Instead of manually analyzing each withheld document, the system copies relevant information patterns from similar disclosed documents, significantly reducing the time and effort required for privilege log generation while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If manual privilege log generation is used, then document analysis can be performed, but resource costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument analysis efficiencyVSAvoidresource costs for manual processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating content-by-example logs and privilege logs without requiring manual intervention. The algorithm autonomously performs document similarity comparison, metadata extraction, and log generation, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring human resources for each document analysis task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical manual process of privilege log generation with an automated computational system. Instead of lawyers or paralegals manually reviewing and logging each document, a computer-based similarity function and automated logging system perform the task, substituting human mechanical effort with algorithmic processing that consumes fewer human resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If traditional privilege log methods are used, then withheld documents can be identified, but additional information about withheld documents is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation availability about withheld documentsVSAvoidcomplexity of log generation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The content-by-example log serves as an intermediary structure between disclosed and withheld documents. It contains similarity associations, metadata, and characteristic information from disclosed documents that illuminate the nature of withheld documents without revealing privileged content. This intermediary provides rich information about withheld documents while maintaining the necessary confidentiality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a new dimension to document analysis by creating content-by-example logs that include similarity scores, associated disclosed document identifiers, and metadata relationships. This additional dimensional information about withheld documents provides insights into their content and characteristics without requiring direct access to the privileged material itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250328573A1Systems and Methods for Document Analysis to Produce, Consume and Analyze Content-By-Example Logs for Documents
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
  • US20250328573A1 patent drawing
  • US20250328573A1 patent drawing
  • US20250328573A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Document analysis systems and methods for the generation of a content-by-example log that expresses withheld documents in terms of a set of disclosed documents are disclosed. Additionally, document analysis systems and methods for the analysis of such a content-by-example log to determine withheld documents of interest without access to those withheld documents are disclosed.