Content-by-Example Logs for Withheld Document Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing document analysis systems face challenges in efficiently generating and analyzing privilege logs for withheld documents, leading to burdensome, time-consuming, and resource-intensive manual processes, especially in complex litigations with large volumes of electronic documents.

Innovation Solution

A content-by-example log is generated by analyzing withheld documents against a set of disclosed documents using a similarity function, associating identifiers for similar documents, and providing additional metadata, allowing for efficient analysis and challenge of withholding decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual processes are used to generate and analyze privilege logs for withheld documents, then detailed analysis and challenge of withholding decisions can be performed, but the process becomes burdensome, time-consuming, and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated computational systems. Machine learning models and natural language processing algorithms automatically analyze withheld documents, generate privilege logs, and identify challenges, eliminating the need for manual attorney review while maintaining or improving analysis accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates automated copies and representations of withheld documents through metadata extraction and similarity analysis. By generating content-by-example logs that replicate key document characteristics without requiring access to the actual withheld content, the system enables efficient analysis while preserving confidentiality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If manual review of large volumes of electronic documents is performed to identify withheld documents, then comprehensive coverage can be achieved, but resource consumption and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument identification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual document review is replaced with automated machine learning systems that can process large volumes of electronic documents rapidly. These systems use natural language processing, classification algorithms, and pattern recognition to identify withheld documents with high accuracy while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis of documents to identify potential withheld documents before final review. By pre-processing documents with machine learning models to flag those likely to be withheld, the system reduces the volume of documents requiring detailed human review while ensuring comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If detailed information about withheld documents is provided in privilege logs, then receiving parties can effectively challenge withholding decisions, but the producing party must invest significant resources in creating accurate logs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechallenge process efficiencyVSAvoidlog generation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual process of creating detailed privilege logs is replaced with automated systems that extract metadata, generate descriptions, and populate log entries from withheld documents. This automation reduces the complexity of log generation while providing receiving parties with sufficient information to make informed challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables receiving parties to self-serve in analyzing privilege logs by providing them with searchable databases, similarity analysis tools, and automated challenge identification features. This reduces the need for complex manual review processes while improving ease of operation for challenging withholding decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12585707B2Systems and methods for document analysis to produce, consume and analyze content-by-example logs for documents
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
  • US12585707B2 patent drawing
  • US12585707B2 patent drawing
  • US12585707B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Document analysis systems and methods for the generation of a content-by-example log that expresses withheld documents in terms of a set of disclosed documents are disclosed. Additionally, document analysis systems and methods for the analysis of such a content-by-example log to determine withheld documents of interest without access to those withheld documents are disclosed.