Content Feedback System for Engagement Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content creation tools lack effective feedback mechanisms to help authors optimize their content for engagement and sentiment, leading to suboptimal user interaction and limited content performance in public forums.

Innovation Solution

A content feedback system that analyzes attributes of a target content item, identifies similar published content items, determines effectiveness scores based on user engagement and sentiment, and provides graphical indications and recommendations for improvement, allowing authors to enhance their content in real-time while drafting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a content feedback system is implemented to analyze and provide recommendations for content items, then content effectiveness and user engagement are improved, but system complexity and computational resources required are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where published content items are analyzed based on user engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares) and sentiment analysis. This feedback is then used to generate effectiveness scores and provide recommendations to authors for improving their content, creating a continuous improvement loop that enhances content quality over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The content feedback system acts as an intermediary between published content and authors. It analyzes content attributes, compares them with published content, and provides actionable recommendations without requiring direct author-to-author interaction or manual content evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system analyzes multiple attributes of content items and compares them with published content, then feedback accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by pre-processing published content items and storing their attributes (text, images, video, audio) along with engagement metrics and sentiment scores. This allows the feedback system to quickly retrieve and compare relevant data without performing complex analysis in real-time when generating feedback for new content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The content analysis is segmented into multiple independent attributes including text content, images, video, and audio. Each attribute can be analyzed separately using appropriate methods (e.g., sentiment analysis for text, image recognition for visuals), allowing parallel processing and reducing overall computation time while maintaining comprehensive feedback accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If the system provides detailed feedback and recommendations for content improvement, then content quality is enhanced, but the complexity of the feedback mechanism increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent qualityVSAvoidfeedback mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism provides localized, attribute-specific recommendations rather than generic overall feedback. It analyzes and provides targeted suggestions for specific content elements (text, images, video, audio) based on their individual performance and comparison with published content, allowing authors to improve specific aspects of their content systematically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11061990B2Generating feedback for a target content item based on published content items
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US11061990B2 patent drawing
  • US11061990B2 patent drawing
  • US11061990B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for generating feedback for an unpublished content item based on published content items are disclosed. A content feedback engine identifies published content items associated with similar attributes as the unpublished content item. Effectiveness scores of the published content items are determined. The content feedback engine determines an effectiveness score for a portion of the unpublished content item based on the effectiveness scores of the published content items. The content feedback engine presents a graphical indication that marks the portion of the unpublished content item based on the effectiveness score for the portion of the unpublished content item. Additionally or alternatively, the content feedback engine recommends content to be added to and/or removed from the unpublished content item based on the content and/or attributes of the published content items.