Content Group Augmentation via Automatic Document Clustering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Knowledge workers face challenges in efficiently grouping and finding relevant content within large document corpora, leading to laborious manual searches and potential omission of useful documents.

Innovation Solution

A content group augmentation module that automatically clusters documents into subgroups, analyzes user-selected documents, and recommends additional relevant content based on these subgroups, with a feedback mechanism to refine relevance scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual searching and grouping of documents is performed, then users can find relevant content, but the process becomes laborious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent grouping efficiencyVSAvoidtime for manual search
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic document clustering and content group augmentation without requiring manual user intervention. The content group augmentation module autonomously analyzes user-selected documents, clusters similar documents, and recommends additional relevant content, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring continuous manual searching and grouping by users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If content is grouped into large content groups, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but false positives increase and categorization accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategorization accuracyVSAvoidcontent group size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments large content groups into smaller sub-content groups through automatic clustering. By dividing the content group into multiple subgroups based on similarity analysis, the system maintains comprehensive coverage while reducing false positives and improving categorization accuracy within each subgroup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different clustering criteria and relevance thresholds to different sub-content groups. Each subgroup is optimized with local quality measures appropriate to its specific content domain, allowing for more accurate categorization within each segment rather than applying a uniform standard to the entire large content group.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If automatic clustering into subgroups is implemented, then finer categorization is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategorization precisionVSAvoidclustering system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical categorization processes with automated computational clustering algorithms. The content group augmentation module uses machine learning-based clustering to automatically create sub-content groups, substituting the need for manual classification mechanics with automated digital processing that achieves finer categorization precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The content group augmentation module acts as an intermediary between the user's document corpus and the final categorized content groups. It mediates the complex clustering process by automatically analyzing document similarities, creating subgroups, and presenting refined categorizations to users, thereby managing system complexity while delivering precise categorization results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If user feedback mechanism is added, then recommendation accuracy improves, but interaction complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance score accuracyVSAvoidfeedback system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where user interactions with recommended content (acceptance, rejection, or modification of content group augmentations) are captured and used to refine the clustering algorithms and relevance scoring. This feedback loop continuously improves recommendation accuracy by learning from actual user preferences and behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10146774B2Content augmentation based on a content collection's membership
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 CA TECH INC
  • US10146774B2 patent drawing
  • US10146774B2 patent drawing
  • US10146774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may include selecting a document from a user's corpus, analyzing content of the selected document, and determining a target content group based on the content of the selected document. The method may further include locating a relevant document based on the determined target content group, and presenting the relevant document to the user. In particular, the target content group may be selected form a plurality of predetermined content groups, wherein the predetermined content groups are automatically generated based on clustering of documents of a content group into subgroups that are similar to each other.