Content Item Placement Engine Using Rank Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content distribution systems fail to optimally position content items on a content property based on user interaction patterns and performance metrics, leading to suboptimal engagement and revenue generation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that identify content items associated with performance measures, determine rank scores for these items, and strategically place them and other content items at locations on a content property based on these scores, using a content item engine to optimize placement and display.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If content items are distributed based on traditional methods without rank scoring, then distribution simplicity is maintained, but user interaction rates and engagement are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating rank scores for content items based on historical performance data, user profiles, and contextual factors before distribution. This allows the system to make informed placement decisions without complex real-time calculations, thereby improving interaction rates while managing system complexity through advance preparation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical distribution methods with an intelligent ranking system that uses automated scoring algorithms. The content item engine substitutes manual or simple rotational distribution with a data-driven ranking mechanism that dynamically determines content placement based on calculated rank scores, improving engagement while maintaining automated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If content items are placed in fixed locations on content properties, then placement simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to user preferences and performance optimization is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement adaptabilityVSAvoidplacement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic content placement by continuously updating rank scores based on real-time user interactions, contextual changes, and performance feedback. Content items are dynamically repositioned on content properties according to their current rank scores, allowing the system to adapt to changing user preferences and optimize engagement while maintaining automated operation through the content item engine

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where user interactions with content items are tracked and used to update rank scores. The system receives feedback on content performance, user behavior patterns, and engagement metrics, then uses this information to adjust content placement decisions, improving adaptability while managing complexity through automated feedback loops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If all content items are displayed uniformly across content properties, then display consistency is maintained, but differentiation based on performance and user relevance is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent placement precisionVSAvoidranking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by assigning different rank scores to different content items based on their specific attributes, performance history, and relevance to user profiles. Each content item receives differentiated treatment in terms of placement priority and location, with high-ranking items placed in prime positions and lower-ranking items in secondary positions, achieving precise content placement while managing complexity through item-specific scoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8311875B1Content item location arrangement
Publication Date: 2012.11.13 GOOGLE LLC
  • US8311875B1 patent drawing
  • US8311875B1 patent drawing
  • US8311875B1 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more content items associated with a content property are identified, each of the one or more content items associated with one or more performance measures. A rank score is determined for each of the one or more content items. One or more locations are identified for display proximate to the one or more content items based on the rank score for each of the one or more content items, and one or more other content items are provided for display in each of the one or more content item locations.