Content Optimization Engine Using Social Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in filtering relevant content from numerous sources due to varying levels of interest and quality, leading to information overload and clutter, as traditional content recommendation systems fail to account for individual user preferences and social interactions.

Innovation Solution

A content optimization engine that utilizes social graph information, including social signals from friends and connections, to rank and aggregate content from multiple sources, creating a personalized feed that prioritizes content relevant to the user based on their social network interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If users subscribe to multiple content feeds to increase content variety, then content quantity increases, but information overload and clutter increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent quantityVSAvoidinformation overload
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses social signals (likes, shares, comments) as feedback mechanisms to dynamically adjust content recommendation. Content that receives positive social engagement is prioritized in user feeds, while content with low engagement is deprioritized, creating a feedback loop that continuously optimizes content relevance without requiring users to manually filter content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of content selection from static user-defined feed subscriptions to dynamic social signal-based ranking. By incorporating engagement metrics (number of likes, shares, comments) as weighting parameters, the system automatically adjusts content priority based on collective user behavior patterns rather than fixed subscription rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If traditional content recommendation systems use static feed subscriptions, then user control over content sources is maintained, but content relevancy to individual user interests decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidcontent relevancy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple functions into a unified recommendation engine that simultaneously provides user control over content sources and automated relevance filtering. Users can still subscribe to specific feeds while the system applies social signal analysis across all subscribed content, creating a multi-functional system that delivers both user agency and intelligent curation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If content is delivered via user-selected feeds, then user preference for content sources is respected, but quality and interest alignment of content decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed selection flexibilityVSAvoidcontent quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces social signals as an intermediary layer between user feed subscriptions and content delivery. Instead of directly delivering all content from subscribed feeds, the system uses social engagement metrics as a mediating filter that prioritizes high-quality content while maintaining user-selected source diversity, effectively decoupling source flexibility from quality assurance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9240020B2Method of recommending content via social signals
Publication Date: 2016.01.19 YAHOO ASSETS LLC
  • US9240020B2 patent drawing
  • US9240020B2 patent drawing
  • US9240020B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for recommending content via social signals is provided. Two different content sets having content objects that have content-identifying information are received from separate content providers. Social graph information is received from a service provider. A portion of the first content set and a portion of the second content set are aggregated based at least in part on the social graph information, thereby generating a third content set.