Content Playback Policy Based on Section Priority

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for playing back contents on electronic devices do not distinguish between major and non-major sections, leading to inefficiencies in network quality, data consumption, and playback time, especially under poor network conditions, resulting in inconvenient breakages and inefficient cost and time usage.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device method that recognizes major sections of content and adjusts playback based on network speed, data remaining amount, and playback time, implementing policies such as priority playback, quality adjustment, and multiple speed modes to optimize playback efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If contents are played back uniformly without distinguishing major and non-major sections, then the playback process is simple, but network quality deteriorates and playback interruptions occur under poor network conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayback process complexityVSAvoidplayback continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the content into major sections and non-major sections, allowing differential playback strategies. Major sections are prioritized for download and playback, while non-major sections are deferred or downloaded at lower quality, ensuring critical content is delivered even under poor network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality levels and priority treatments to different parts of the content. Major sections receive high priority and high quality playback, while non-major sections receive lower priority and reduced quality, optimizing network resource allocation for each segment based on its importance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If all sections of contents are downloaded at the same quality, then the download process is simple, but data consumption increases without proportional value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedownload process complexityVSAvoiddata consumption efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements differential quality downloading where major sections are downloaded at high quality and non-major sections at low quality or skipped entirely. This optimizes data consumption by allocating bandwidth proportionally to content importance rather than treating all sections equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and prioritizes major sections from the overall content, separating them from non-major sections. This allows the system to download only the essential portions at high quality, removing the waste of downloading low-value content at the same data cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If contents are played back without section differentiation, then the playback control is simple, but playback time increases due to inefficient resource allocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayback control complexityVSAvoidplayback time efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments playback into priority levels, allowing the system to quickly deliver and play back major sections first. This segmented approach reduces overall playback time by ensuring critical content is available sooner, even if non-critical content is delayed or reduced in quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary identification and prioritization of major sections before playback begins. This preliminary action allows the system to pre-download and prepare critical content, reducing the time users wait for important sections to become available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If uniform playback quality is maintained, then the user experience is consistent, but network bandwidth is wasted on non-critical sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience consistencyVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality differentiation where major sections maintain high quality for consistent user experience, while non-major sections use reduced quality. This optimizes bandwidth utilization by allocating network resources to sections that matter most to user experience rather than wasting bandwidth on less important content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9888277B2Content playback method and electronic device implementing the same
Publication Date: 2018.02.06 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US9888277B2 patent drawing
  • US9888277B2 patent drawing
  • US9888277B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing a playback of contents in an electronic device is provided. The method includes recognizing a major section of the contents, obtaining at least one of setup information related a network speed, data remaining amount and playback, and playback time of the contents, and deciding a playback policy of the contents based on at least one of the recognized major section and the obtained information.