Content Recommendation Mapping for Unavailable Titles and Catalog Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Consumers face frustration in navigating vast content libraries due to overwhelming choices, leading to dissatisfaction as they often stick to familiar content, and content providers struggle to recommend relevant content due to limited access and technical challenges in generating personalized recommendations in real-time for millions of users.

Innovation Solution

A content recommendation system that utilizes a content library with enriched metadata and an ontology of 10,000 features to generate personalized recommendations by mapping user search queries to related content, even if the exact title is not available, leveraging user profiles and collaborative techniques to suggest content likely to be of interest.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If content providers offer a large variety of content sources and titles, then content availability and user choice are improved, but the complexity of navigating and finding relevant content increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent availabilityVSAvoidcontent navigation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary content recommendation system that acts as a mediator between users and the vast content library. This system uses machine learning models to analyze user preferences and automatically generates personalized content recommendations, eliminating the need for users to manually navigate through complex content catalogs. The intermediary layer translates user needs into relevant content suggestions without requiring users to directly interact with the complexity of the full content inventory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating and delivering personalized content recommendations based on user viewing history and preferences. The machine learning models continuously learn from user behavior patterns and autonomously adjust recommendations without requiring manual configuration or complex user input. This allows the system to serve itself in curating and delivering appropriate content, freeing users from the complexity of manual content selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If the system provides personalized content recommendations in real-time, then user satisfaction is improved, but the computational complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser satisfactionVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-processing and storing user preference data, content metadata, and model parameters in advance. The machine learning models are trained offline using historical data, and the results are cached for rapid retrieval during real-time recommendation generation. This preliminary preparation allows the system to respond quickly to user requests without performing complex computations in real-time, reducing processing complexity while maintaining high user satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by focusing computational resources on the most important aspects of recommendation generation rather than processing every possible content item equally. The machine learning models prioritize and weight different features and user preferences based on their importance, applying full computational analysis only to the top candidate items. This selective processing approach maintains personalization quality while significantly reducing overall processing complexity and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If content providers access and integrate external content libraries, then content variety is improved, but data management and metadata mapping complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent varietyVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by creating a unified content recommendation system that handles multiple content sources and external libraries through a single integrated framework. The machine learning models are designed to process diverse content types and external data formats using the same core algorithms and data structures. This multi-functional approach allows the system to aggregate content from various sources without requiring separate processing pipelines for each source, thereby managing data complexity while maintaining high content variety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting metadata fields and content attributes based on the specific external library being accessed. The machine learning models can adapt their feature extraction and weighting parameters to match different content schemas and external data formats. This parameter adaptation allows the system to integrate diverse external content sources without requiring complex manual configuration or rigid data management structures, reducing overall system complexity while expanding content variety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250225172A1Content recommendation system and method
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 THINKANALYTICS
  • US20250225172A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225172A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225172A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of providing one or more content item recommendations for a user of a content distribution system, comprising: determining if a user search using a title of content finds the title of content in one or more content sources available to the user; identifying, in response to the title of content not being found in the one or more content sources, content in a content library by determining if the title of content is in the content library, wherein the content library contains metadata concerning items of content in the content library, the metadata representing at least some properties of the items of content; using, in response to the title of content being determined to be in the content library, the metadata of the identified content in the content library and metadata concerning content available from the one or more content sources available to the user to generate at least one content item recommendation for the user, wherein the at least one content item recommendation is for recommended content that is related to the identified content, and providing the at least one content item recommendation to the user.