Content Reproduction Apparatus Dynamic Order

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content reproduction systems only determine the reproduction order based on the order of receiving reproduction requests, lacking the ability to consider user evaluations of contents from multiple user terminals, which limits user engagement and entertainment.

Innovation Solution

A content reproduction apparatus and system that creates a shared list of contents from multiple user terminals, allowing users to evaluate and decide the reproduction order based on received evaluation information, enabling users to select and enjoy contents from other users in an unprecedented way.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the reproduction order is determined solely by the order of receiving reproduction requests, then the system operation is simple, but user engagement and entertainment value are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoiduser engagement and entertainment value
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by collecting evaluation information from users about contents and using this feedback to dynamically adjust the reproduction order. Users evaluate contents (e.g., rating them), and the content reproduction apparatus determines the reproduction sequence based on aggregated evaluation results, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to user preferences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The reproduction order transitions from a static sequence (request arrival order) to a dynamic sequence that changes based on real-time user evaluations. The system continuously updates the reproduction sequence as new evaluation information is received, making the system adaptable and engaging while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If user evaluations from multiple terminals are collected and used to determine reproduction order, then user engagement increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The content reproduction apparatus serves multiple functions: it acts as a request receiver, an evaluation collector, an order determination system, and a content reproducer. By consolidating these functions in a single apparatus, the system handles multi-terminal evaluations without requiring complex distributed coordination mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The content reproduction apparatus serves as an intermediary between multiple user terminals and the content reproduction process. It collects evaluation information from various terminals, processes this information centrally, and determines the reproduction order, simplifying the overall system architecture by providing a single point of coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10574709B2Content reproduction apparatus, content reproduction system, and content reproduction method
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 YAMAHA CORP
  • US10574709B2 patent drawing
  • US10574709B2 patent drawing
  • US10574709B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A content reproduction apparatus includes: a receiver that receives first information indicating a first content from a first user terminal capable of providing the first content, and receives second information indicating a second content from a second user terminal capable of providing the second content; a processing circuit including a control unit that creates a shared list including the first and second contents, based on the first and second information; and a transmitter that transmits the shared list to the first user terminal. The receiver receives first evaluation information from the first user terminal, the first evaluation information indicating a first evaluation for at least one content included in the shared list. The control unit decides a reproduction order of contents included in the shared list, based on the received first evaluation information.