Electronic Content Review System With Contextual Comment Association

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing processes for editing electronic content, such as visual content involving images or video, are complex and error-prone due to the need for multiple reviewers to collaborate remotely, leading to inefficiencies and increased complexity in managing and reviewing content.

Innovation Solution

A graphical user interface (GUI) based electronic content editing process that allows seamless review, commenting, and editing of electronic content among multiple participants, facilitated by a client-server network using XML or other content management languages, enabling efficient collaboration and streamlined communication of comments and edits directly associated with specific portions of the content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple reviewers collaborate remotely using traditional electronic mail or Internet processes, then reviewers can be located remotely from one another, but the editing process becomes complex and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote collaboration capabilityVSAvoidediting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized server as an intermediary that manages all content review processes. The server stores content, coordinates between multiple reviewers, and handles version control, thereby simplifying the complex remote collaboration process into a standardized workflow where reviewers only need to interact with the system through a consistent interface rather than managing complex peer-to-peer coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The review system is designed as a universal platform that handles multiple functions including content storage, reviewer coordination, version control, and feedback management within a single integrated system. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate tools and processes for each aspect of remote collaboration, reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If content is sequentially sent among multiple reviewers through electronic mail, then each reviewer can provide their input, but the process becomes relatively long and complex to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereviewer input collectionVSAvoidediting process duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous review workflows where multiple reviewers can work on the same content simultaneously or in overlapping sequences without interruption. The server maintains continuous version control and coordinates reviewer access, allowing the review process to flow continuously rather than stopping and restarting with each sequential email transfer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary setup of the review workflow, pre-configuring reviewer assignments, access permissions, and version control parameters before the review process begins. This preliminary configuration eliminates the need for manual coordination during the review process, allowing reviewers to immediately begin their work without managing process logistics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If traditional electronic content review processes are used, then reviewers can provide comments and edits, but extensive explanations are needed and errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomment and edit communicationVSAvoidreview process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system adds a new dimension to comment and edit communication by associating feedback directly with specific content elements through hyperlinks and contextual markers. Instead of requiring reviewers to write extensive explanations about which content needs modification, the system provides structured fields for comments and automatically links them to the relevant content portions, reducing the need for lengthy descriptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8943408B2Text image review process
Publication Date: 2015.01.27 ADOBE INC
  • US8943408B2 patent drawing
  • US8943408B2 patent drawing
  • US8943408B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques that facilitate review of bitmapped representations of text in a file are described. In some embodiments, one or more signals representative of cursor movements over a bitmapped representation of text in a bitmap image may be received. One or more selected text elements may be determined based on the cursor movements. Determining may include searching a data structure, separate from the bitmap image, which includes information regarding text element locations corresponding to the bitmapped text representation in the bitmap image. A portion of the bitmapped representation of text corresponding to the determined selected text elements may be highlighted.