Content Storage Management With Automatic Off-Site Relocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content storage systems, such as personal recording devices and computers, limit the amount of programming that can be stored due to fixed storage capacities, requiring frequent upgrades or deletions, which is time-consuming and burdensome for users.

Innovation Solution

A system that aggregates content, monitors storage space, relocates content when necessary, and provides access to off-site storage to manage content libraries efficiently without requiring upgrades or additional storage systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If fixed storage capacity is used in content storage devices, then device simplicity is maintained, but the amount of content that can be stored is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of content storedVSAvoidstorage management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a storage management system that acts as an intermediary between the user and the storage device. This system automatically monitors storage capacity, identifies content for relocation, and manages the relocation process, thereby resolving the contradiction by handling storage complexity automatically while expanding effective storage capacity through cloud connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The storage management system operates autonomously to monitor storage capacity, evaluate content priority, and relocate files without requiring user intervention. This self-service approach resolves the contradiction by automatically managing storage complexity while maximizing the usable storage capacity of the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Quantity of substance

If storage capacity is upgraded to accommodate more content, then content storage capacity increases, but device cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent storage capacityVSAvoidstorage system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends storage capacity into a new dimension by utilizing cloud-based off-site storage. Instead of increasing local storage hardware, the system creates a virtual extension of storage capacity through network connectivity, thereby increasing storage capacity without adding physical complexity to the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The storage management system serves as an intermediary that transparently manages the transition between local and off-site storage. It handles the complexity of multi-location storage management while presenting a unified storage interface to users, effectively increasing capacity without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If content is manually monitored and managed in storage, then storage optimization can be achieved, but user time and effort are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage space utilizationVSAvoidtime for storage management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The storage management system automatically performs monitoring, evaluation, and relocation of content without user intervention. It self-manages storage optimization by continuously evaluating content priority and automatically relocating files, thereby achieving efficient storage utilization while eliminating the time and effort previously required from users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where storage usage is monitored, evaluated against priority criteria, and automatically adjusted through relocation operations. This automated feedback mechanism achieves optimal storage utilization without requiring user time or effort for manual management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If personal recording devices are used to build content libraries, then content selection flexibility is improved, but storage capacity limitations arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent library flexibilityVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the storage capacity limitation by adding a cloud-based storage dimension to the personal recording device. Users can maintain their flexible content library selections locally while automatically utilizing off-site storage for less frequently accessed content, thereby expanding total storage capacity without compromising content selection flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUSRE50576E1Methods, systems, and storage mediums for managing content storage and selection
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 CHANYU HOLDINGS LLC
  • USRE50576E1 patent drawing
  • USRE50576E1 patent drawing
  • USRE50576E1 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments relate to methods, systems, and storage mediums for managing content storage and selection activities. The method includes aggregating content from content providers and presenting the content to a content device. The method also includes monitoring consumption of storage space with respect to storage capacity in the content device, relocating content contained in the storage space of the content device when a predetermined condition is met, and providing access to relocated content. The relocation is operable for freeing up the storage space of the content device.