Content Tracking System for Collaborative Meeting Redundancy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In large organizations, collaborative groups often face inefficiencies due to isolation and lack of connection, leading to redundant efforts, compatibility issues, and unawareness of similar projects, as they share electronic content without adequate collaboration.

Innovation Solution

A content tracking system that intercepts and analyzes shared content during meetings, identifies similarities across different groups, and provides recommendations for collaboration, using a network interface, content interceptor, analyzer, and comparer to facilitate inter-group alignment and reduce redundancy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If groups work independently without connection, then each group can focus on its specific task, but redundant efforts and compatibility issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegroup efficiencyVSAvoidawareness of similar projects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring shared content across groups and providing notifications when similar projects are detected. This feedback loop enables groups to become aware of redundant work and adjust their efforts accordingly, resolving the contradiction between independent work and information awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The content tracking system acts as an intermediary that indirectly connects groups by analyzing their shared content and facilitating communication when similarities are detected. This intermediary approach allows groups to maintain independence while still benefiting from cross-group awareness and coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If groups share electronic content freely, then collaboration is enhanced, but difficulty in finding relevant content and staying aligned increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration capabilityVSAvoidcontent relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual content searching and relevance assessment with automated content analysis using machine learning models. This substitution transforms the mechanical process of manual content review into an automated system that can efficiently detect and measure content relevance across multiple groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically analyzing and categorizing shared content without requiring manual intervention. Groups benefit from automated content organization and relevance detection, reducing the burden of manually managing and searching through shared electronic content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If multiple groups address the same issue independently, then each group can develop its solution, but redundant development effort and resource waste occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment efficiencyVSAvoidredundant development effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by proactively analyzing shared content and identifying potential redundancies before groups invest significant resources in development. By detecting similar projects early through content analysis, the system enables groups to coordinate efforts and avoid redundant development work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to groups about overlapping work through notifications and alerts. This feedback mechanism allows groups to adjust their development plans and collaborate more effectively, reducing redundant effort and resource waste while maintaining development productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11907906B2Shared content similarity analyses
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US11907906B2 patent drawing
  • US11907906B2 patent drawing
  • US11907906B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one example in accordance with the present disclosure, a content tracking system is described. A network interface of the system couples the content tracking system to multiple computing devices. A content interceptor intercepts content shared during a collaborative meeting. A content analyzer analyzes shared content to determine a topic of the shared content and a content comparer identifies similarities between shared content of different collaborative meetings. An interface of the content tracking system provides a recommendation to at least one user participating in at least one of the different collaborative meetings based on an output of the content comparer.