Collaborative Content Voting Interface for Faster Group Consensus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing productivity applications do not provide a satisfactory user experience when group consensus is needed in a multi-user collaborative workspace, leading to inefficient manual editing and excessive computing resource utilization due to uncoordinated user contributions and the need for multiple communication channels.

Innovation Solution

A computationally efficient human-computer interface that allows users to vote on content portions using input gestures, with a server analyzing these votes to modify content based on priority, potentially incorporating machine learning and user context, thereby reducing the need for manual editing and optimizing resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple communication channels are used for user coordination, then consensus can be achieved, but computing resource utilization increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveconsensus achievementVSAvoidcomputing resource utilization

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple communication channels and coordination efforts into a single unified voting mechanism. Users cast votes on content portions through one interface, and the server consolidates all voting data to determine consensus, eliminating the need for multiple separate communication channels and reducing computing resource utilization while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as an intermediary that receives votes from multiple users, analyzes the voting data to determine consensus, and automatically modifies content based on the results. This intermediary process replaces multiple direct user-to-user communication channels, achieving consensus efficiently while reducing overall computing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If users manually edit content to reach consensus, then content can be modified, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecontent modificationVSAvoidtime consumption

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of voting data to determine consensus before any content modification occurs. The server analyzes all votes, identifies the winning content portion, and only then modifies the content accordingly. This preliminary action eliminates the need for users to manually coordinate and edit content step-by-step, significantly reducing time consumption while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service content modification through automated voting and consensus determination. Users simply cast votes, and the server automatically processes the voting data and modifies the content based on the determined consensus, eliminating the need for users to manually edit content and reducing time consumption significantly.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If uncoordinated user contributions are allowed, then collaboration is flexible, but computing resource utilization increases due to conflicts

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecollaboration flexibilityVSAvoidcomputing resource utilization

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where users cast votes on content portions, the server analyzes the voting data to determine consensus, and then automatically modifies content based on the results. This feedback loop coordinates user contributions efficiently, maintaining collaboration flexibility while reducing computing resource utilization by preventing conflicts through automated consensus determination.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If users coordinate through shared communication sessions, then consensus can be reached, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveconsensus coordinationVSAvoidsystem complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the coordination function from complex shared communication sessions and implements it as a simple voting mechanism. Users vote on content portions through a straightforward interface, and the server handles the complex analysis and consensus determination, reducing device complexity while maintaining reliable consensus coordination.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3821379B1Computationally efficient human-computer interface for collaborative modification of content

Publication Date: 2026.03.11 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC

Figure 1A
Figure 1B
Figure 1C

AI summary

Technologies are disclosed that enable a computing system to collect and process user preferences regarding content that is shared in a collaborative workspace. By the use of an input gesture, individual users of a multi-user sharing session can provide a vote for a portion of content indicating that they favor ("up-vote") or disfavor ("down-vote") the content. The system can collect and analyze the votes from each user. The system can then modify the content based on the votes. Modifications to the content can include, but are not limited to, rearranging selected portions of the content, generating annotations, generating one or more UI elements that bring focus to portions of the content, identifying high-priority content or low-priority content, or deleting portions of the content.