Contention-Based Feedback Channel for Wireless Uplink Capacity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mechanisms for delivering ACK/NACK and CQI feedback in wireless communication systems, particularly in CELL_FACH state, are inefficient and detrimental to uplink capacity due to the lack of dedicated resources, leading to impractical scenarios with high retransmission rates and capacity impacts.

Innovation Solution

A contention-based physical random access feedback channel (P-RAFCH) is introduced, allowing WTRUs to randomly select physical resources for sending pre-configured signals, with Node-Bs calculating the number of WTRUs based on used resources, and implementing power control mechanisms to minimize uplink interference and ensure reliable data delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dedicated resources are allocated for ACK/NACK and CQI feedback delivery, then feedback reliability is improved, but uplink capacity is reduced and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback delivery reliabilityVSAvoiduplink capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The P-RAFCH is designed as a universal feedback channel that serves multiple functions: delivering ACK/NACK feedback, CQI feedback, and enabling WTRU counting, all through a single contention-based random access mechanism. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate dedicated feedback channels, preserving uplink capacity while maintaining feedback delivery capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

WTRUs autonomously select their own physical resources from the P-RAFCH resources without requiring dedicated resource allocation from the network. This self-service mechanism reduces signaling overhead and network control complexity, allowing the system to maintain high uplink capacity while providing reliable feedback delivery through the self-organizing random access process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If dedicated resources are allocated for feedback delivery, then feedback reliability is improved, but device complexity and network complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback delivery reliabilityVSAvoidfeedback mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

WTRUs autonomously select their own physical resources from the P-RAFCH resources without requiring dedicated resource allocation from the network. This self-service mechanism reduces signaling overhead and network control complexity, allowing the system to maintain high uplink capacity while providing reliable feedback delivery through the self-organizing random access process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the feedback mechanism by transitioning from dedicated resource allocation to contention-based random access. This parameter change simplifies the feedback mechanism by eliminating complex resource management while maintaining reliability through the statistical properties of the random access process and network-controlled retransmission policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional RACH is used for feedback delivery, then uplink capacity is preserved, but feedback reliability deteriorates and retransmission rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplink capacityVSAvoidpacket delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The network pre-configures the P-RAFCH with sufficient physical resources and establishes transmission criteria before WTRUs need to send feedback. This preliminary setup ensures that when WTRUs need to deliver feedback, they have pre-allocated resources to contend for, reducing the likelihood of feedback loss and subsequent retransmissions while maintaining uplink capacity efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the network monitors the P-RAFCH for feedback messages and transmission criteria violations, and responds by retransmitting downlink data or adjusting P-RAFCH configuration. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable packet delivery by detecting and correcting transmission failures without requiring dedicated feedback resources, thus maintaining both uplink capacity and feedback reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9391735B2Method and apparatus for sending feedback for a downlink shared service and estimating a number of wireless transmit/receive units
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC
  • US9391735B2 patent drawing
  • US9391735B2 patent drawing
  • US9391735B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and an apparatus for sending a signal on a contentious feedback channel for a downlink shared service and for estimating a number of wireless transmit/receive units (WTRUs) are disclosed. When a transmission criterion associated with a physical random access feedback channel (P-RAFCH) is satisfied, a physical resource is randomly selected among a plurality of physical resources assigned for the P-RAFCH and a pre-configured signal is sent using the selected physical resource. A Node-B receives the pre-configured signal from a plurality of WTRUs and calculates a number of the WTRUs based on a number of used physical resources. The transmission criterion is at least one of successful reception of a data packet on a downlink physical channel, successful reception of a data block on a data service, reception of a signaling command, occurrence of a measurement event, and failure to receive a transmission after a specified number of times.