Context-Aware Break Management System for Reducing Sedentary Behavior

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional break management systems rely solely on timers or keystroke counting, leading to reminders that often occur at inopportune times, resulting in annoyance and ineffectiveness in reducing sedentary behavior and computer-related injuries.

Innovation Solution

A break management system that integrates manual-input data, contextual information such as schedule, location, and habit data, using machine vision and machine learning to provide intelligent and timely break recommendations, minimizing disruptions and improving adherence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional timer-based break management systems are used, then the system is simple to implement, but the reminders occur at inopportune times causing annoyance and reducing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of break remindersVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user context (schedule, location, habits) before issuing break reminders. The contextual integrator pre-processes calendar events, location data, and habit patterns to determine optimal break timing, ensuring reminders are delivered at appropriate moments rather than using simple fixed-time timers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The contextual integrator acts as an intermediary between raw data sources (calendar, location, habits) and the break recommendation engine. This intermediary component synthesizes multiple data types to create context-aware timing decisions, resolving the contradiction by adding intelligence without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple data sources are integrated for context-aware recommendations, then the effectiveness and personalization of break reminders improve, but the device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoiddata integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments data integration into distinct functional components: manual-input integrator for keyboard/mouse data, contextual integrator for calendar and location data, and habit integrator for user behavior patterns. Each segment processes specific data types independently, then combines results to achieve high personalization without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The contextual integrator serves multiple functions simultaneously: it processes schedule information, location data, and habit patterns, while also providing timing recommendations to the break recommender. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by consolidating diverse data processing capabilities into a single versatile component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If break reminders are based solely on timer or keystroke counting, then the system is easy to operate, but the reminders are often ineffective and annoying

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem usabilityVSAvoidbreak recommendation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically collects and processes contextual data (calendar events, location, habits) without requiring manual user input or configuration. The contextual integrator and habit integrator continuously monitor and analyze user behavior patterns, enabling effective personalized recommendations while maintaining ease of operation through automated self-configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where break recommendation outcomes are monitored and used to refine future recommendations. The habit integrator learns from user responses to break suggestions, adjusting timing and duration based on actual behavior patterns, thereby continuously improving effectiveness while maintaining simple operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10552772B2Break management system
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 INTEL CORP
  • US10552772B2 patent drawing
  • US10552772B2 patent drawing
  • US10552772B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of a break management apparatus may include a manual-input integrator to integrate manual-input-related information for a user, a break timer communicatively coupled to the manual-input integrator to time a period of time since a prior break-related action of the user as a break-related action and to provide timer-related information, a contextual integrator to integrate contextual information for the user in addition to the manual-input-related information and the timer-related information, and a break recommender communicatively coupled to the break timer and the contextual integrator to recommend that the user take a recommended break-related action based on the period of time since the prior break-related action of the user and also based on the contextual information for the user. Other embodiments are disclosed and claimed.