Context-Aware Code Translation via IR and LLM

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing code translation methods face challenges such as the need for large task-specific datasets, poor generalization, and the loss of language-specific properties during translation, leading to semantic gaps and readability issues.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that efficiently translates program code by parsing source code into an Intermediate Representation (IR), establishing a structural and semantic model, and using a Large Language Model (LLM) to translate ordered tasks into a target language, while maintaining context-awareness and coherence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional SSA-based IR is used for code translation, then data flow analysis efficiency is improved, but language-specific properties and semantic integrity are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata flow analysis efficiencyVSAvoidlanguage-specific properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the code translation process into distinct phases: parsing source code to IR, transforming IR to SSA form for analysis, then reconstructing the target code while preserving semantic information. This segmentation allows efficiency gains from SSA without permanently losing language-specific properties, as the reconstruction phase restores them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary representation that bridges SSA form and target code by preserving semantic information during transformation. This intermediary structure acts as a mediator that maintains language-specific properties while benefiting from SSA-based data flow analysis efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If LLMs are used for in-context learning in code translation, then natural language processing capability is improved, but token overflow and incorrect translation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenatural language processing capabilityVSAvoidtranslation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary static analysis to the IR before LLM translation, establishing structural and semantic models that constrain and guide the LLM's in-context learning. This preliminary preparation prevents token overflow and ensures translation accuracy by providing a solid foundation for the LLM to work within.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the structured IR and semantic models provide continuous guidance to the LLM during translation. This feedback loop ensures that the LLM's natural language processing capabilities are harnessed effectively while maintaining translation accuracy and preventing errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If traditional fine-tuning with gradient descent is used, then model convergence is achieved, but large task-specific datasets are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel convergenceVSAvoiddataset size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses IR and semantic models as intermediaries that encode task-specific knowledge, replacing the need for large annotated datasets. These intermediaries serve as compact representations that guide the translation process without requiring extensive fine-tuning data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical gradient descent fine-tuning process with a more efficient approach using pre-trained LLMs guided by structured IR representations. This substitution achieves model convergence without the resource-intensive process of traditional fine-tuning on large datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If conventional transpilation methods are used, then code translation is achieved, but semantic gaps and readability issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation speedVSAvoidsemantic integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary static analysis and establishes semantic models before translation, ensuring that semantic integrity is preserved throughout the process. This preliminary preparation prevents semantic gaps while maintaining translation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces semantic models as intermediaries between source and target code that preserve language-specific properties and semantic information. These intermediaries act as bridges that maintain readability and semantic integrity while enabling efficient translation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250199787A1Neural network-based context-aware code translation and optimization
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250199787A1 patent drawing
  • US20250199787A1 patent drawing
  • US20250199787A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for efficiently translating program code from a source language to a target language. Input source code is parsed, using a processor device, into an Intermediate Representation (IR). A structural and semantic model of the source code are established by applying static analysis to the IR, and a program skeleton of the target code is constructed from the IR, including generating context-aware placeholders. The IR is transformed into a Single Static Assignment (SSA) form, and a System Dependency Graph (SDG) is built from the SSA form. The SDG is traversed to order translation tasks, and ordered tasks are translated into the target language using a Large Language Model (LLM). A translated program is generated by integrating translated code segments into a coherent program structure in the target language.