Context-Aware Insight Evaluation for Data Visualization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data visualization techniques fail to accurately present insights required by users due to misalignment with user context, as they rely on uniform template data that does not account for varying user needs and data contents.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that calculates relevance between context data and evaluation dataset elements, evaluates insight subjects, and displays information relevant to user insights, using processors to obtain, calculate, and display insights based on user context and dataset relevance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If uniform template data is used for data visualization, then the visualization process is simplified and automated, but the visualization results do not accurately reflect user context and requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of visualization processVSAvoidaccuracy of user context understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically generates multiple candidate visualizations by varying template parameters based on data characteristics and user context, rather than using a fixed uniform template. This allows the visualization process to adapt automatically to different scenarios while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes template parameters such as chart type, aggregation method, and grouping based on the evaluated relevance to user context. By dynamically adjusting these parameters according to data features and contextual information, the system maintains automation while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple evaluation metrics are used to assess insight subjects, then the evaluation comprehensiveness is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of insight evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation process is segmented into multiple independent metrics (relevance to user context, data coverage, visual clarity, etc.), each calculating a specific aspect of insight quality. This modular approach allows comprehensive evaluation while managing complexity through independent, focused calculations for each metric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If relevance calculation between context data and dataset elements is performed, then the precision of insight identification is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of insight identificationVSAvoidprocessing time for relevance calculation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates relevance for a selected subset of candidate visualizations rather than all possible combinations. By performing partial relevance calculations on the most promising candidates identified through template parameter variation, the system achieves sufficient precision without exhaustive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12554727B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 NEC CORP
  • US12554727B2 patent drawing
  • US12554727B2 patent drawing
  • US12554727B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To display information providing an insight required by a user, provided is an information processing apparatus (1) including: an obtaining section (11) that obtains an evaluation dataset and context data; a relevance calculation section (12) that calculates a relevance between the context data and a constituent element of the evaluation dataset; an evaluation section (13) that carries out evaluations of a plurality of insight subjects generated with reference to the evaluation dataset and the relevance; and a display section (14) that displays information relevant to the insight subjects.