Context-Aware Payment Processing System for Automated Transaction Authorization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electronic payment systems require user interaction, which is time-consuming and prone to unauthorized activities, and also involve inefficiencies in scheduling events and processing payments.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses machine learning to analyze contextual data from user devices to automatically process transactions and schedule events without user input, by comparing pre-authorized amounts and locations to ensure secure and seamless payment processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional electronic payment systems are used, then payment processing can be performed, but user interaction is required which is time-consuming and prone to unauthorized activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction requirementVSAvoidtime for user input and authorization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-authorizing payment amounts and pre-establishing contextual parameters (location, event details) before the actual payment event occurs. This allows the payment to be automatically processed without requiring user input at the point of sale, as the authorization was already granted in advance based on predicted needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The payment system performs self-service by automatically detecting contextual information (location, event type, amount), comparing it against pre-established parameters, and executing payment without human intervention. The system serves itself by making autonomous decisions based on pre-configured rules and machine learning models, eliminating the need for user interaction during the payment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If user interaction is required for payment authorization, then security against unauthorized activities can be maintained, but the payment processing becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against unauthorized activitiesVSAvoidpayment processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Security measures are performed in advance by pre-authorizing payment amounts and establishing contextual parameters before the payment event. The system pre-establishes trust boundaries by defining maximum amounts and acceptable contexts beforehand, allowing rapid automatic processing while maintaining security through pre-configured authorization limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors contextual information (location, event details, amount) and provides feedback by comparing real-time data against pre-established parameters. This feedback mechanism enables automatic security verification without user intervention, as the system autonomously determines whether the transaction context matches authorized parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If machine learning is used to automatically process transactions, then user interaction is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic payment processingVSAvoidsystem complexity for contextual analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex automation system is segmented into distinct functional modules: contextual information collection, machine learning prediction, parameter comparison, and payment execution. Each module performs a specific function, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design. The segmentation allows the system to handle complexity internally while presenting a simple interface to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components (contextual analysis layer, prediction models, parameter matching layer) that mediate between the user's needs and the payment processing system. These intermediaries handle the complexity of automated decision-making by translating contextual information into authorization decisions, shielding users from system complexity while enabling high-level automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If contextual data is collected and analyzed, then seamless payment processing can be achieved, but data processing requirements and system resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseamless payment processingVSAvoidcomputational resources for data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by collecting and analyzing only the specific contextual data necessary for payment authorization (location, event type, amount) rather than processing all possible user data. This selective approach enables seamless payment processing while minimizing computational resources required, as the system focuses only on relevant parameters needed for authorization decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11704669B1Dynamic contactless payment processing based on real-time contextual information
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US11704669B1 patent drawing
  • US11704669B1 patent drawing
  • US11704669B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Arrangements for payment and recommendation control are provided. In some aspects, contextual data may be received from a user. For instance, data such as calendar data may be received and an event may be identified. Based on the event, a pre-authorized amount may be identified for payment associated with the event. The system may receive a request for payment and event details. The amount may be compared to the pre-authorized amount and, if more than the pre-authorized amount, a request for payment authorization may be transmitted to a user device. If the amount is not more than the pre-authorized amount, expected location data of the user may be received and current location data of the user may be requested from a user device. The location data may be compared and, if the locations match, the payment may be authorized and automatically processed.