Context-Aware Software Recommendation System for Code Quality and Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software development tools are limited by lexical and syntax-centric constraints, leading to suboptimal code quality and reduced developer productivity due to their inability to suggest alternative libraries and modules beyond the locally installed ones, resulting in inefficient software development processes.

Innovation Solution

A context and complexity-aware recommendation system that uses machine learning and semantic analysis to suggest existing functions and libraries based on temporal source-code context and developer feedback, incorporating Integral Computational Complexity Cost (IC3) metrics for resource utilization and deployment considerations, and employing generative adversarial networks for vulnerability testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If lexical and syntax-centric tools are used for code completion, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but code quality and developer productivity deteriorate due to inability to suggest alternative libraries and modules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoiddeveloper productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary recommendation system that sits between the developer and the codebase, analyzing temporal source-code context and suggesting appropriate libraries, modules, and functions. This intermediary component processes developer intent and matches it with suitable code elements from the existing codebase, enabling developers to access a broader range of options without directly managing the complexity of the entire codebase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of code suggestion by incorporating temporal context analysis and complexity metrics. Instead of relying solely on lexical and syntax patterns, the system evaluates multiple parameters including code context, temporal relationships, complexity costs, and vulnerability assessments to generate recommendations that balance simplicity with quality and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive code analysis and multiple suggestion options are provided, then code quality improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing context-specific recommendations rather than uniform suggestions. The system analyzes the local temporal context of the source code and provides tailored recommendations that are appropriate for each specific coding situation. This allows the system to maintain high code quality through precise, context-aware suggestions while managing complexity by focusing analysis on relevant local areas rather than the entire codebase uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical code completion mechanisms with an intelligent recommendation engine that uses machine learning and temporal context analysis. This substitution enables comprehensive code analysis and multiple suggestion options while managing system complexity through automated contextual understanding and intelligent filtering of recommendations based on complexity metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Use of energy by moving object

If traditional auto-completion tools are used, then system resource utilization is low, but code construction speed and accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem resource utilizationVSAvoidcode construction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-analyzing the codebase and maintaining temporal context information about code relationships, dependencies, and usage patterns. This preliminary preparation enables the recommendation system to quickly generate accurate suggestions without performing extensive real-time analysis, thus improving code construction speed while maintaining reasonable resource utilization through advance preprocessing of code information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service mechanisms where the recommendation engine continuously learns from developer interactions and code usage patterns, automatically improving its suggestions over time. This self-improving capability allows the system to enhance code construction speed and accuracy while optimizing resource utilization through adaptive learning rather than requiring constant external tuning or analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If vulnerability testing and security assessment are performed, then software reliability improves, but development time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware reliabilityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing vulnerability testing and security assessment as part of the code recommendation process itself. Instead of conducting separate security reviews after code development, the system proactively identifies potential vulnerabilities and security issues during the suggestion generation phase, allowing developers to address security concerns early in the development process and reducing overall development time while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where vulnerability assessment results are fed back into the recommendation engine. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from security issues and improve its suggestions accordingly, providing developers with security-aware recommendations that enhance software reliability without requiring separate, time-consuming security review processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11269622B2Methods, systems, articles of manufacture, and apparatus for a context and complexity-aware recommendation system for improved software development efficiency
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 INTEL CORP
  • US11269622B2 patent drawing
  • US11269622B2 patent drawing
  • US11269622B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus, systems, articles of manufacture, and methods for a context and complexity-aware recommendation system for efficient software development. An example apparatus includes a current state generator to generate a representation of a current state of a new function, an instruction predictor to generate a first recommended software component based on the current state of the new function, a complexity cost determiner to rank the first recommended software component based on a weighted sum of associated partial cost values, the software component to be ranked against second recommended software components based on a comparison of partial cost values corresponding to respective ones of the second recommended software components, a risk identifier to detect vulnerabilities based on an attack surface of a portion of the first recommended software component, and a ranking determiner to generate a third recommended software component, the third recommended software component corresponding to respective ranking metrics.